Posted on 03/21/2005 5:25:35 AM PST by Brilliant
You are exactly right. I don't like the fact that a Clintoon appointee got the case. I fear that Terry's life may be coming to an end this week. This judge likely won't take any action The pro-death RATs (and a few FR members....ugh) want this innocent woman dead - even though the medical evidence, and eyewitness sworn affidavits point to the fact that she is not in a PVS or brain dead as the media and left would have us believe.
I feel that the only viable option left is to bump up the prayers.
Couldn't they at least get a court order for an IV while the judge reviews the case?
The Lord is Terri's Shepherd --- That's Relationship !!!
She shall not want --- That's Supply !!!
He maketh her to lie down in green pastures --- That's Rest !!!
He leadeth her beside the still waters --- That's Refreshment !!!
He restoreth her soul --- That's Healing !!!
He leadeth her in the paths of righteousness --- That's Guidance !!!
For His name sake --- That's Purpose !!!
Yea, though Terri walks through the valley of the shadow of death --- That's Testing !!!
She will fear no evil --- That's Protection !!!
For Thou art with her --- That's Faithfulness !!!
Thy rod and Thy staff they comfort her --- That's Discipline !!!
Thou preparest a table before Terri in the presence of her enemies--- That's Hope !!!
Thou annointest her head with oil --- That's Consecration !!!
Her cup runneth over --- That's Abundance !!!
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow Terri all the days of her life --- That's Blessing !!!
And she will dwell in the house of the Lord --- That's Security!!!
Forever --- That's Eternity !!!
Congressional Subpoena & President Signs Schiavo Bill --- That's Deliverance !!!
Face it ---- The Lord is crazy about Terri !!!
Otherwise --- Why else would He continuously deliver her from
the evil hands of her attempted murderers ???
Yes...it is gut wrenching
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
I dunno. There are a potload of cases out there. I haven't read any of them. But another sort of case is interesting too, that being a person who goes on a hunger strike. Those folks are often force fed against their wishes!
Anyway, the SCOTUS has ruled that NY State's law prohibiting doctor assisted suicide is not unconstitutional. Vacco v. Quill. 521 US 793 (1997)
There is also the Cruzan case. CRUZAN v. DIRECTOR, MDH, 497 US 261 (1990) <-- Link.
In Cruzan, a young woman was in a PVS, and her parents wanted to have her starved to death. The state of Missouri require clear and convincing evidence that the PVS person would have voluntarily starved to death under the circumstances, and SCOTUS, in a 5-4 ruling, upheld that state requirement. Apparently the parent met the threshold, becuase Cruzan's feeding tube was removed after a second state trial.
What troubles me in this case is the lack of irrefutable documentation as to the wishes of the individual. The assumption all along, and all the decisions to date, seem to be based on hearsay, the word of one individual who obviously has serious conflicts of interest, as to what Terri's wishes are/were. I know when I was appointed my mother's legal guardian when she fell ill with Alzheimer's, I had to present to the court a legal document attesting to her wishes regarding "heroic measures" of life preservation. The document was drawn up (previously) by her attorney, signed by the individual and witnesses, and notarized. Lacking that, it was my understanding that the default assumption by the court and the caregivers was that the individual would have wished to live, and actions taken would be based on this assumption.
What is most troubling to me is the role of judicial activism in this. The law in Fla. is that the court can order that extraordinary lifesaving measures be ceased, if she's in a persistent vegetative state. The judge basically expanding the definition of persistent vegetative state so that he could order that she be euthanized. And then he was faced with another problem, namely that she was not receiving extraordinary lifesaving measures anyway. So he ordered that she be denied food and water. I don't see how food and water could be considered an "extraordinary" lifesaving measure. But then, that's what judicial activism is about.
The culture of death has come to encompass an extraordinary range of concepts, all geared towards assuring that the death of individuals, typically those who are unable to defend themselves or make their wishes known, or who are deemed "inconvenient" or "unproductive", occurs. Not the least of which are the tortured legal interpretations regarding "privacy", as extended to any number of barbaric and heinous practices. The creeping, incremental introduction of the concept of the default assumption that death is preferable to life, is probably the most dangerous threat we as a people face today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.