To: deepFR
Sounds like they're addressing current issues in light of God's word. I have no problem with that. The end message regarding the sex thing is that it is NOT okay to do it.
14 posted on
03/18/2005 12:13:15 AM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Sounds like they're addressing current issues in light of God's word. I have no problem with that.
Nor would anyone else, depending on how you do it. Assuming sin, and not virtue, is not really a very safe catechism. The role of fiction is to make virtue look credible and sin deplorable. It's better to tell a story where the admirable kids, the popular kids, are made to appear too sure of themselves to mimic Madonna in their personal lives. The Chrisitan novelist, or story teller, or film maker, should make loose girls look like diseased, pock-marked sluts. Christian boys should be made to look like strong, gentlemanly, chaste warriors for Christ. Agnostics should look like effeminate homosexuals.
114 posted on
03/20/2005 10:17:40 AM PST by
farmer18th
(Compromising with absurdity is absurdity)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson