Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CIB-173RDABN
The presumption someone is harmless is another thing, especially when the facts indicate the prisoner isn't harmless.

If correct procedures were set in dealing with this guy, then nothing would have happened. The problem wasnt a video camera not being in his cell, nobody was watching anyways, the problem was proper safety precautions werent being used on the guy.

110 posted on 03/14/2005 11:03:23 AM PST by smith288 (The GOP, Ditech of politics... "lost another one to GOP" - Howard dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: smith288

There will be some huge lawsuits pending now! Mega!


111 posted on 03/14/2005 11:14:36 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: smith288
We don't disagree on that point. Our disagreement is your comment that the prisoner has some right of privacy.

The only time a prisoner should have a right of privacy is when talking to their attorney.

119 posted on 03/14/2005 11:37:21 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson