[elhombrelibre]

My most frustrating thing is when people argue it was a sovereign country. So if a gangster takes over a country, kills a large percentage of its people, causes millions to flee, persecutes religious minorities, treats that nation's economy like a personal bank account, starts wars with its neighbors, defies the peace treaties after losing a war and fires on US planes, and won't follow 14 UN Security Counsel Resolutions, all he has to do is say, "F*** you. This is a sovereign country." Arguing with people who think that's fine is frustrating for me.

[txradioguy]

Well let's not forget to we have had justification to march on Baghdad from the first time he violated the rules of his surrender.

It just took us awhile to get someone agin with some calcium in his spine to enforce those terms of surrender.

Plus these idiots who say "well Saddam wasn't threatening the U.S." are BS! Everytime he loosed a weapon or aimed a radar at one of our aircraft he was directly threatening the U.S.

I'm still amazed on an almost daily basis the lies about the whole situation that are passed of as fact and no one challenges what's being said.

[GGpaX4DumpedTea]

"So if a gangster takes over a country...(and) say(s), "F*** you. This is a sovereign country."

That is exactly what we have in Venezuela right now.