1 posted on
03/11/2005 5:19:09 PM PST by
Fizzie
To: Fizzie
9Wants to Know has learned several regents are concerned about new allegations of plagiarism against Churchill. NOW the liberal media give a **** about the fact that this churchill guy is just a posing loser of a professor who got his 15 minutes at the expense of the brave victims of 9-11. Shame on them.
2 posted on
03/11/2005 5:21:04 PM PST by
Tamar1973
(The path to conservative brilliance starts at Free Republic!)
To: Fizzie
So there is still hope that there are some adults in the CU system???
3 posted on
03/11/2005 5:21:11 PM PST by
Bahbah
To: Fizzie
Lane says he was notified by the attorney for CU Friday afternoon that the Board of Regents need more time to consider whether they want a buy-out deal.Why buy out the jerk when you can fire him for cause for his plagarism?
4 posted on
03/11/2005 5:21:46 PM PST by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: Fizzie
I'm sorry, but watching these liberals try to bribe their way out of the consequences of their phony idealism is what schadenfreude is all about.
6 posted on
03/11/2005 5:23:40 PM PST by
Argus
(Mi tagline es su tagline)
To: Fizzie
$300,000-400,000 is less than reported this last week, but still a perversion.
the other alternative is to just let him stay there and teach. in either case, the stench is not going to go away for a LONG time.
7 posted on
03/11/2005 5:24:41 PM PST by
ken21
( today's luxury development. tomorrow's slum.)
To: Fizzie
There should be an awards for Scumbag Lowlife' s of the Year .
People like Ward Churchill could be nominated .
Although I can think of a long list of contenders at this point , there is something uniquely perfidious about this
professor Neanderthal .
Can someone please make a website that allows we conservative people to call these people for what they are , and vote on it?
I wish.....
14 posted on
03/11/2005 5:34:18 PM PST by
injin
(" until the fight is won....")
To: Fizzie
Perhaps, just perhaps, the board of regent now is considering to fire him based on the plagiarism case rather than buy-out?
17 posted on
03/11/2005 5:36:52 PM PST by
paudio
(Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
To: Fizzie
As far as I'm concerned, the inflammatory call to arms against Americans makes Ward Churchill an enemy combatant and he should be treated as such.
19 posted on
03/11/2005 5:39:56 PM PST by
SerpentDove
(Does anybody really give a Dan?)
To: Fizzie
"Continue teaching"...UNTILL HE'S FIRED!
more here
21 posted on
03/11/2005 5:43:16 PM PST by
traderrob6
(http://www.exposingtheleft.blogspot.com)
To: Fizzie
This lying marxist (I know, repeating myself) is getting just what he wants. He's gonna get payed off and werk somewhere else. The best thing to do is let this POS dry up and blow away. The faux American Indian plaigerist will always have a job somewhere in the academe.
Nuff said.
FMCDH(BITS)
23 posted on
03/11/2005 5:46:08 PM PST by
nothingnew
(There are two kinds of people; Decent and indecent.)
To: Fizzie
So ol' Ward's a capitalist after all.
24 posted on
03/11/2005 5:46:57 PM PST by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: Fizzie
Pay him! They should sue him for his salary since he was hired under false pretenses.
To: Fizzie
Ward Churchill...is like an onion;the more one finds out,there's always yet another layer to peel away.
To: Fizzie
FIRE THE SOB AND LET HIM TRY TO MAKE HIS CASE IN COURT.
THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HIM IS OVERWHELMING.
29 posted on
03/11/2005 6:01:36 PM PST by
jackbill
To: Fizzie
Give him a box of monopoly money and tell him to get the F out.
34 posted on
03/11/2005 6:12:40 PM PST by
TheForceOfOne
(Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
To: Fizzie
I hope this drags out a long time and costs CU a ton. The consequences of this hiring should be reflected in the lack of enrollment, lack of alumni support and legal costs. There should be consequences for the actions of those administrators who hired such a loser, just as there are for any company who hires an employee who abuses their position.
The concept of "faculty tenure" is so intriguing. Just think of the parallel in private life. There is none.
Why is that?
To: Fizzie
A certain Dr. Denice Denton attacked Summers, but also insisted that his peccadillo might be profitably exploited as a teachable moment. But it turns out that Denton, the newly appointed chancellor of the University of California at Santa Cruz, had had her own teachable moment though one that was as quickly forgotten by the media as Summerss was lasting. Again, in the bizarre world of academia, the chance tearing of a scab reveals quite interesting things underneath. Even before Chancellor Denton arrived at her new $275,000 job, she had negotiated a special university position as well for her girlfriend, Gretchen Kalonji, described as her partner of seven years, for the princely annual sum of $192,000 a billet that was specially created, unadvertised, and closed to all other job applicants. This novel variant of spousal accommodation was precisely the sort of old-boy networking in public hiring that transparent affirmative-action protocols were supposedly designed to stop. In contemporary university parlance: Was there not a worthy Latina or African-American woman who could have at least been interviewed for the job?
The Denton-Kalonji household will have a combined income of at least $467,000 plus up to another $50,000 granted to Kalonji for the expenses incurred in her transition in moving to the area. This supplement comes on top of a previous $68,750 granted to Chancellor Denton to move to the rent-free, service-provided University Presidents House.
Giving a couple already making almost a half-million dollars a year nearly $120,000 to move to California prompted outrage: not from the tenured feminists on the Santa Cruz campus, but from the universitys blue-collar employees, secretaries, and maintenance staff. At a time of record state budget deficits, workers had not received a raise in three years. Meanwhile student fees had recently increased by 10 percent and the Santa Cruz campus had just gone through $14 million in state budget cuts the prior year. Among the elite of the nations professoriate, class considerations always bow to gender sensitivity.
What are we to make of all these recent university teachable moments? The usual exegeses suffice: The contemporary campus has devolved into an Orwellian world in which the ends usually justify the means. Diversity really means no diversity of ideas. Unfettered expression is a code word for groupspeak of the Left. Academic freedom and tenure ensure timidity and monotony of thought. The champions of the oppressed and discriminated are, in fact, the affluent and privileged, whose antics are excused only by the irrelevancy of academic culture and properly deplored solely through the accidental discovery of a forgotten rant or taped remark.
Underneath all this is the disturbing fact that progressive campuses are charging their students tuition whose annual increases exceed the rate of inflation, while vocal professors have plenty of idle time on their hands and live lives that most Americans or their own college staff members can only dream of.
Teachable Moments But who will teach the teachers? by Victor Davis Hanson
44 posted on
03/11/2005 7:25:41 PM PST by
John Lenin
(A little anarchy and it's curtains)
To: All
49 posted on
03/11/2005 8:31:22 PM PST by
Big Guy and Rusty 99
(Watch out for bears, to them you are spaghetti dinner)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson