Skip to comments.
POLL: For 2008, Republicans Have Early Lead
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion ^
| March 10, 2005
Posted on 03/11/2005 9:40:03 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
All of this early polling is getting on my last ragged nerve. I can promise you that the whold field will change before it is over!!!!!!!
2
posted on
03/11/2005 9:45:03 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
('We voted like we prayed")
To: West Coast Conservative
This is a bit absurd to have polling this far in advance of the next presidential election.
3
posted on
03/11/2005 9:45:19 AM PST
by
marvlus
To: West Coast Conservative
The early stats are tiresome no doubt, but this one is rather encouraging. Hillary loses to nearly everyone!! Of course it's mostly about name recognition, unfortunately.
4
posted on
03/11/2005 9:48:04 AM PST
by
BonnieJ
To: marvlus
This is a bit absurd to have polling this far in advance of the next presidential election.Right. I didn't know Rudy and McCain were announced candidates.
5
posted on
03/11/2005 9:50:31 AM PST
by
My2Cents
(America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
To: marvlus; All
This is a bit absurd to have polling this far in advance of the next presidential election. I agree, but as along as Hillary is thinking of running for president in 2008 the pollsters will be bombarding us with polls until then. The Clintons are notorious for using pollsters and the Pollsters love doing it.
6
posted on
03/11/2005 9:51:03 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
To: West Coast Conservative
The poll also showed that Barney Bush would defeat Ron Prescott Reagan by 35%.
7
posted on
03/11/2005 9:51:03 AM PST
by
My2Cents
(America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
To: marvlus
"This is a bit absurd to have polling this far in advance of the next presidential election."
No kidding! What percentage would Kerry have gotten (among the democratic contenders) on March 11, 2001? I personally would have said, "John Kerry? The John Kerry that was the traitor during Viet Nam? You ARE surely kidding if you think he'd even RUN for the presidency!"
8
posted on
03/11/2005 9:53:37 AM PST
by
Maria S
(Prayer: Don't give God instructions -- just report for duty!)
To: West Coast Conservative
This is a "push poll" to get McCain and Giuliani into the lead of the GOP pack early in the public perception (they are both liberal, RINO and the favorites of the MSM). They will thereby be the frontrunners the other candidates need to "beat" - whether either has announced or not.
Dishonest, shameless manipulation by the usual suspects....
9
posted on
03/11/2005 10:01:22 AM PST
by
Gritty
("Rascality has limits; Stupidity has none."-Napoleon)
To: West Coast Conservative
10
posted on
03/11/2005 10:02:22 AM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: Gritty
OK I know im ignorant but... What does MSM stand for?
11
posted on
03/11/2005 10:03:57 AM PST
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: West Coast Conservative
We can't poll yet because Hillary would do well against anyone or loose closely now. The reason is shes the only one pursuing the presidency actively on a national level. There are a few republicans pursuing the nomination, but not on a national level yet.
To: West Coast Conservative
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 51% - 43% Condoleezza Rice (R)
If this is true, America is insane.
13
posted on
03/11/2005 10:05:17 AM PST
by
MikeA
To: West Coast Conservative
The pollster hacks have learned(from has the media swine) they can manipulate voter sentiment.
This is a blatant attempt to influence the 08 presidential race.
14
posted on
03/11/2005 10:07:44 AM PST
by
TUX
(Domino effect)
To: Khepera
It's shorthand for Main-Stream Media.
15
posted on
03/11/2005 10:09:30 AM PST
by
Parmenio
To: West Coast Conservative
If John McCain was put up as a Presidential candidate, I think John McCain has baggage from the Vietnam war that would hamper his bid for presidency the same as Kerry's bid was hampered.
There needs to be another candidate other then John McCain.
To: Parmenio
Thank you for explaining.
17
posted on
03/11/2005 10:15:49 AM PST
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: Parmenio
Thank you for explaining.
18
posted on
03/11/2005 10:15:51 AM PST
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: West Coast Conservative
I'd almost rather have hillary than McMainiac. Hopefully it will never happen, but if it does, the Republican party would lose big time with its carefully built base.
20
posted on
03/11/2005 10:25:45 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson