[KeyesPlease]

***Fajardo said the incident should have been labeled a hate crime by police. "Because it's a minority writing to another minority, it's not considered a bias crime," Fajardo said. "That, to me, is a flaw in the law."***

Scary and sad for the children that this guy is a School Board member.

[Enterprise]

D'OH!

[expatpat]

There are a lot of these cases. Why do some minorities do it, i.e., send themselves hate-mail?

[Rebelbase]

Why is it scary and sad that Fajardo is a School Board member?

[GaltMeister]

Ship 'em out on the short bus.

[trebb]

Seems to me it should be considered a hate crime because the intent was to foster dislike and distrust of whites. Oops,silly me - no such thing as a hate crime against whites.

[airborne]

So, if something like this would be considered a "hate crime", would teachers having sex with students be a "love crime"?

[goldstategop]

Ward Churchill also committed a hate crime. Why isn't that a good enough reason to fire him? Calling every American a "Little Eichmann" is a hate crime in my book.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[ken21]

you're right!

the democrat plantation.

[Condor51]

***"Because it's a minority writing to another minority, it's not considered a bias crime," Fajardo said. "That, to me, is a flaw in the law."***

A 'flaw'. Gee, ya think?

And yes it is scary, but this is even scarier (IMO).

If Rondell would have been 'Hispanic' then we are in a whole new ball game. It's the black hole of LE, as by the DOJ & FBI crime reporting standards, Hispanics are "White". It is then left up to the individual gubmint agent how to classify the Hispanics 'race'. It is truly a coin toss. If he decides the Hispanic is a minority (as they unusually claim they are) - no hate crime, BUT if he decides the Hispanic is 'white' - BINGO we have a hate crime.

If you take a look, a Loooooooong look (hours) at the DOJ stats as to 'white on black' Hate Crimes and then look at the icarceration numbers for 'whites', blacks' and "hispanics", you'll then see the farce in this methodology. In fact there is almost ZERO 'white on black' hate crimes percentage wise.

[PLK]

Another fake hate crime. These are becoming so commonplace that ALL alleged hate crimes should be considered fake until determined otherwise. Many folks have been made fools of - at the University of Iowa students marched and rallied for days for a black College of Dentistry student who was the purported "victim" of hate messages. Then the security video monitor in a computer lab caught her in the act of writing hate messages and sending them to herself. Of course, in typical left-wing academia fashion, the response was continued sympathy for her - the reasoning for this was that she was so traumatized from past racist acts by society against her that she was suffering psychologically.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

RE: "Why do some minorities do it, i.e., send themselves hate-mail?"

I suppose the Sacramento area is typical.

Lots of publicity, victims, above the fold stories, victims, outraged editorials against intolerance, victims, candle lighting, victims, wailing and prayers, victims, outrage against whites, victims. The usual 1960s era stuff.

Then sudden quiet.

That's the signal to watch the want-ad garage sales -- usually among the lava lamp ads -- for who really done it. If not there then tune in local conservative talk radio for confirmation that they had it right all along.