OK perhaps I over generalized. The reason I made that comment was due to the web search I made on male nipples to see if I overlooked anything. Most of the evolutionist explanations that explained that male nipples were becaused we evolved from lower animals that had them, started off with the statement that "They are not ornamental". (Search WebMD.com for male nipples).
How they can make such a blanket statement is beyond me.
Nevertheless, I stand corrected, and apparently evolutionists only reject male nipples as ornamental. Ornamental items can indeed be seen in much evolutionist work.
Although I am curious why evolutionists think ornamentation evolved as an aspect of sexual selection. It seems like brute strength and stamina would be preferred.
In other words.. If we were evolutionary products,
wouldn't we deem this...
attractive over this?....
