If what you "know" about what he "meant" is accurate, then why can't you provide anything which actually supports your interpretation. Why have you had to resort to fabricating bogus "quotes" so far in order to dishonestly "support" your interpretation?
Clearly, your "knowledge" of Dennett's alleged "hidden meaning" is actually based only on your own bigotry and self-delusions.
I hope this upsets you. Call more names, it hurts so good.
There's nothing quite like the spectacle of a creationist who is *proud* of shocking people with his dishonesty.
If you don't believe creation happened..where did the universe begin and organization start?
Your lame attempt to divert the subject from your own slanderous dishonesty is fooling no one.
I wonder if Dan Rather is a creationist. He seems to have all the dishonest attributes. Maybe we should think of creationism as "a Dan Rather-style report on Darwin."