Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Semper
It is certainly possible to be against abortion and still be for the decision on abortion to be made by the individuals most directly involved. The person most

directly involved is the innocent child threatened with death by poison, chemical burning, or dismemberment. A government which refuses to provide legal protection to the innocent against violent assault is both derelict in its duties and unspeakably pussilanimous. The same can be said of those citizens in a Republic who refuse to compel their government to do its duty.

39 posted on 03/03/2005 2:29:55 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
The person most directly involved is the innocent child threatened with death

The actual threat here is that the opportunity to experience human existence (most likely under less than desirable conditions) is denied - maybe permanently or maybe not.

It is my belief that life consists of much more than we here in this human experience can ever imagine. Human birth and death do NOT encompass all of God's creation. What seems important is to experience the best QUALITY of life as possible and constantly try to progress towards our original creation in the image and likeness of God. An unlimited quantity of human beings on this earth, likely living a poor quality of life, does not seem to lead to that goal.

47 posted on 03/03/2005 3:22:37 PM PST by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson