Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alienating Washington - and for what? (Canada's Liberals' childish anti-Americanism)
National Post (Canada) ^ | February 28, 2005 | Lorne Gunter

Posted on 02/28/2005 10:04:24 AM PST by GMMAC

Alienating Washington - and for what?

National Post
Monday, February 28, 2005, Page: A16
Byline: Lorne Gunter

If Prime Minister Paul Martin feels obliged to warn the Americans not to invade Canadian airspace with their anti-ballistic missiles in case they're attacked, isn't he also obliged to warn the North Koreans, the Iranians, the Chinese and whomever else might someday fire a ballistic missile through our airspace in the other direction?

I mean, it is our airspace, after all. Surely, the PM's warning applies to all nations alike. He can't be worried just about an American breach, can he?

Or is it that Ottawa's refusal to endorse ballistic missile defence (BMD) actually has nothing to do with Canadian sovereignty and is really about the Liberals' juvenile anti-Americanism?

Nah. Can't be.

But if the federal government's decision last week really isn't just for show -- if it really isn't just about looking tough by wantonly poking our nearest neighbours in the eye -- then what about those warnings to Pyongyang and Tehran and Beijing?

I'm sure those letters are already in the mail.

Heck, if this isn't just some narrow-minded, petulant, political temper tantrum, shouldn't Mr. Martin be telling the whole world: "Look everybody, if anyone, anyone at all, violates Canadian airspace, we're gonna ... we're gonna ...

"Oh, hang it. There's nothing we can do. But be sure of this: We're gonna be really, really huffy. Got it?

"We'll hector you into a pounding headache. Maybe we'll even dispatch an Arctic Ranger on a snowmobile, rifle slung over his shoulder, to stare up at the sky, shake his fist and curse your family's name as your missile overflies Canada."

Last week in this space, I argued that the U.S. preoccupation with BMD is misplaced. While I am confident the Americans will eventually develop the technology to shoot down incoming missiles in flight, I'd bet the biggest nuclear threats to the United States aren't missile-based. Even if rogue states manage to manufacture workable nukes, they're more likely to sneak them into the States on container ships than on the tips of ICBMs.

Or their strikes will be "in-theatre" -- overhead large concentrations of American soldiers on some far-off battlefield.

Still, I'd intended to use this week's column to lay out a case for why Canada should go along with missile defence, anyway. The Yanks weren't asking us to help pay. They weren't asking us to site their interceptor missiles on Canadian soil or cede control of our national air defences to their generals.

Basically, they were asking us for just two things: an endorsement and real-time warning of inbound missiles. And we were already giving them the one they really want -- the real-time warning.

And I suspect we will continue to give them warning of any menacing blips we pick up on our radar, even after our refusal to endorse BMD.

Is there anyone in Canada so rabidly anti-American and anti-military that they would argue we not let our neighbours know if a Taepo-Dong 1 or Dong Feng 41 or Shehab-5 were bearing down on Chicago?

They're our neighbours, for crying out loud. And we're supposed to be their friends. We're partners in continental defence and collective security. And BMD, unlike the invasion of Iraq, is not about defending freedom "over there," it's mostly about protecting North America from attacks.

It's not about American aggression, either; it's about protecting America (and Canada) from others' aggression.

Nor does BMD "weaponize space," as so many Canadian critics contend. ICBMs travel through space. Anyone who fired them at the United States would have weaponized space already.

Besides, by not joining the Americans' coalition of the willing in 2003, Ottawa left itself with few choices to prove its reliability as an American ally. As imperfect as BMD was as a defence priority, it was a low-threshold way for Ottawa to show friendship with Washington, and the Liberals blew it.

More irritating still is the likelihood that the Libs blew off the Americans to keep BMD from ripping apart their biennial convention in Ottawa next weekend.

Thanks to our withdrawal from BMD, the Americans now have every excuse to refuse to co-operate on trade, mad cow disease, border security and a host of other issues. It is bad enough that we would provoke them in this way. That we would do so not because of real differences over missile policy, but rather to ensure some big Liberal gathering goes smoothly, is an additional disgrace.

Lorne Gunter
Columnist/Editorial Writer, National Post
Columnist, Edmonton Journal
Tele: (780) 916-0719 / E-mail: lgunter@shaw.ca


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; hatingamerica; liberalstupidity; missiledefence; paulmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Lorne Gunter at his best!

Note: as you can't spell "Liberal" without spelling L-I-A-R, this is likely far from Martin's final position on the topic.

Further Note: as the National Post operates a pay-to-view website, the url cited only confirms the article's source:
1 posted on 02/28/2005 10:04:28 AM PST by GMMAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...
"Another Liberal International Embarrassment" ping
2 posted on 02/28/2005 10:06:26 AM PST by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

I gotta say, we can talk all we want about how we won't use their airspace to intercept an incoming missile - but when the rubber meets the road, we're going to shoot down the missile the best way we see fit and issue our apologies later.


3 posted on 02/28/2005 10:06:32 AM PST by beezdotcom (I'm usually either right or wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
... this is likely far from Martin's final position on the topic.

I concur.
4 posted on 02/28/2005 10:13:37 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

I don't doubt that. Martin's an idiot if he thinks otherwise.


5 posted on 02/28/2005 10:16:09 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

This section is priceless BUMP!!


Heck, if this isn't just some narrow-minded, petulant, political temper tantrum, shouldn't Mr. Martin be telling the whole world: "Look everybody, if anyone, anyone at all, violates Canadian airspace, we're gonna ... we're gonna ...

"Oh, hang it. There's nothing we can do. But be sure of this: We're gonna be really, really huffy. Got it?

"We'll hector you into a pounding headache. Maybe we'll even dispatch an Arctic Ranger on a snowmobile, rifle slung over his shoulder, to stare up at the sky, shake his fist and curse your family's name as your missile overflies Canada."


6 posted on 02/28/2005 10:16:55 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
With regards to Canada

Go suck a snowball.

7 posted on 02/28/2005 10:18:36 AM PST by An Old Marine (Freedom isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Maybe we need to push for a new government in Canada, a democratic one.


8 posted on 02/28/2005 10:20:40 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine

I totally agree. I stopped caring what the Canadians think and what happens to them, the day they started bashing our President.

I can carry a grudge a long, long time. Fortunately President Bush is a better person than I am!

If someone were to begin building a wall to keep the Canadian whiners out, I would be up there stacking bricks.

Fortunately for them, no matter how ugly they treat American, we will always defend them. Too bad that more of them don't appreciate that.

Oh well. Perhaps the Canadian health care system is punishment enough for them.


9 posted on 02/28/2005 10:36:21 AM PST by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Maybe we need to push for a new government in Canada, a democratic one.

I'm sure we'd settle for an intelligent one.

10 posted on 02/28/2005 10:41:39 AM PST by okie01 (A slavering moron and proud member of the lynch mob, cleaning the Augean stables of MSM since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SusaninOhio

Canada couldn't defend a dog from a flea. Now they've made certain that they've missed another chance to be relevant.

Must he hell to be worthless as *i*s on a bull or a Canadian.


11 posted on 02/28/2005 10:43:33 AM PST by An Old Marine (Freedom isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
Now they've made certain that they've missed another chance to be relevant.

Courtesy of Martin and his cronies.
12 posted on 02/28/2005 10:46:09 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
"Last week in this space, I argued that the U.S. preoccupation with BMD is misplaced. While I am confident the Americans will eventually develop the technology to shoot down incoming missiles in flight, I'd bet the biggest nuclear threats to the United States aren't missile-based.

hmm.....this guy has to be a liberal...albeit a semi- rational one. We don't place "bets" on WMD threats.

13 posted on 02/28/2005 11:01:09 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate". NYTimes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom

Damn right, and so you should. Any American missle or aircraft that wants to 'invade my space' in order to stop an incoming nuke is fine by me. I mean really, I don't see what the big deal is hear for the Liberals and other like-minded Canadians, "Oh no, I feel so violated by an American missile".....give me a break. I especially like the new buzz phrase they've started using "Weaponization of space" LOL.....give me a friggin' break.


14 posted on 02/28/2005 11:03:49 AM PST by Ashamed Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SusaninOhio
I stopped caring what the Canadians think and what happens to them, the day they started bashing our President.

There's more Bush-haters up here than a Ricky Martin loft part....

15 posted on 02/28/2005 11:07:51 AM PST by Ashamed Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ashamed Canadian

part = party


16 posted on 02/28/2005 11:08:10 AM PST by Ashamed Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ashamed Canadian
There's more Bush-haters up here than a Ricky Martin loft party...

Ouch!

You sir, have a great sense of humor

17 posted on 02/28/2005 11:38:57 AM PST by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Ashamed Canadian

I'll second that emotion. I haven't voted Liberal in years.


19 posted on 02/28/2005 12:20:06 PM PST by coydog (My bathroom djinn can beat up your bathroom djinn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Wouldn’t it be fun to have President Bush ask for a written declaration saying that Canada forbids the United States stopping any incoming missiles targeting Canada?


20 posted on 02/28/2005 12:48:11 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson