These Templeton curves really illuminate the issue, IMO. They are embedded in the article, but I don't know how to copy them. You can see them in the original story on NRO.
1 posted on
02/26/2005 8:07:29 AM PST by
WarrenC
To: WarrenC
I don't see this anywhere on the NRO home page - do you have a link?
Many thanks.
D
To: WarrenC
Because of the higher rates of return in the private equity markets The above is the Deus ex machina. Apparently Templeton assumes a 6.4% real return above inflation, with presumably the higher returning offsetting the government SS payout obligation (the workers being better off bit I think was just a throw-away line). Wonderful.
3 posted on
02/26/2005 8:22:20 AM PST by
Torie
To: WarrenC
"He points to a huge amount of borrowing necessary to fund these accounts."
What a load of crap. They're currently funding other vote-buying programs with our SS contributions and then they have the nerve to say we'd have to borrow to fund our own retirement accounts.
5 posted on
02/26/2005 8:34:55 AM PST by
lotusblos
To: WarrenC
Why not have a third system? Maintain the current social security system. Then let others invest as much as they want in tax-free private investments, with the understanding that these investments are for future retirement.
Of course, the federal deficit will probably go through the roof with this plan.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson