Skip to comments.
US Downs Dummy Ballistic Missile in Successful Test
Reuters ^
| 24FEB05
| Jim Wolf
Posted on 02/24/2005 5:55:22 PM PST by familyop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
1
posted on
02/24/2005 5:55:26 PM PST
by
familyop
To: Tailgunner Joe; Southack; TapTheSource
Ping
2
posted on
02/24/2005 5:56:57 PM PST
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: familyop
did the war head come from vandenberg?
3
posted on
02/24/2005 5:57:03 PM PST
by
al baby
(Dick Trickle is not just a medical condition)
To: familyop
So funny how you don't hear about this on the news but every time they fail it makes the cut.
4
posted on
02/24/2005 5:58:48 PM PST
by
msnimje
To: familyop
Tommy Dashole, Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry, Rangel et al are very sad.
5
posted on
02/24/2005 5:59:22 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(This is like deja vu all over again.)
To: familyop
OUTSTANDING!
6
posted on
02/24/2005 5:59:34 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: msnimje
7
posted on
02/24/2005 6:00:22 PM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: msnimje
So funny how you don't hear about this on the news but every time they fail it makes the cut.
Isn't that interesting that it works that way in the MSM.
8
posted on
02/24/2005 6:02:56 PM PST
by
rdl6989
To: Jeff Head
Boy, it must be a trip to be on the bridge for that shot, eh???
Heh, brings out the pyro in all of us!
9
posted on
02/24/2005 6:03:11 PM PST
by
rlmorel
(Teresa Heinz-Kerry, better known as Kerry's "Noisy Two Legged ATM")
To: familyop
Yet another advanced technology we'll have to block from Europeans going forward if they start selling arms to China.
To: MEG33
Although I consider the decision short-sighted and obtuse (yes, I am Canadian), the government of Canada officially turned down an invitation to involve itself with missle defense today. Everything from technical feasibility issues to it leading to the weaponization of space were cited as reasons.
Does anyone else find it odd that this "success" occurred on the very day that Canada said "no, eh"?
To: happyathome
at least we don't have to worry about the Canadians wanting this anymore......
To: rlmorel
I worked on THAADS in the early 90's. We could have had these capabilities 10 years ago...but guess who got in the way and cut it off. That's right, the toon.
13
posted on
02/24/2005 6:05:48 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: familyop
One of these days, one of these things is going to save about a million liberals from getting torched. When that happens, it will have been their idea all along.
14
posted on
02/24/2005 6:06:14 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: canadianally
Does anyone else find it odd that this "success" occurred on the very day that Canada said "no, eh"?
Did the Canadians inform us of the date that they were going to say no so we could do the many weeks of preparation necessary to conduct such a test? Maybe we asked the Canadians to tell us the date of their announcement so we could prepare in advance for it.
15
posted on
02/24/2005 6:08:17 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Jeff Head
Don't worry. Hillary will kill the project and use the savings to fund additional social programs.
To: canadianally
That's okay.
You can pick up the parts that fall in Canada after we shoot it down over Canadian airspace ;)
17
posted on
02/24/2005 6:08:34 PM PST
by
TSgt
(Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
To: Brilliant
No Hitlery won't, she will not get the chance...Condolisa will forge ahead with it...LOL!
18
posted on
02/24/2005 6:09:42 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Jeff Head
Boy, does it burn my butt that Hilliary is doing a makeover that is going to fool a lot of people. I would like to think that a lot of people won't fall for it, but I know a lot will.
To see her on the Senate Armed Services Committee is enough to make me grind all my teeth to stubs. God help us.
19
posted on
02/24/2005 6:10:49 PM PST
by
rlmorel
(Teresa Heinz-Kerry, better known as Kerry's "Noisy Two Legged ATM")
To: canadianally
Well, now instead of, if worse comes to worse and God forbid, interception are made, instead of radioactive material falling to earth over the arctic, they will fall to earth over Canadian soil if they come in over the pole.
Yes, I would say that is rather short sighted.
20
posted on
02/24/2005 6:11:43 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson