Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bella_Bru
This is why so many slaveowners had relations (whether or not against the will of) with their female slaves.

The vast majority of white men, even in the South, weren't slaveowners.

175 posted on 02/16/2005 10:15:04 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

I am aware that most were not slaveowners. However, of those that did, many did not find it repugnant to sleep with a female slave, as white women were to far virtuous to consider having sex with for more than procreative purposes.


177 posted on 02/16/2005 10:17:50 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Campion
The vast majority of white men, even in the South, weren't slaveowners.

True, but something like a third of Southerners had a slave in their household. I imagine daddy, his sons, visiting male family members and assorted male guests were all free to sample the pleasures of the female slaves of the the household.

193 posted on 02/16/2005 10:33:13 AM PST by Modernman ("Normally, I don't listen to women, or doctors." - Captain Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson