Posted on 02/15/2005 1:24:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2
The Democratic leadership has a funny way of showing its commitment to "values." Perhaps it should first decide whether it wants to adopt Christian values, redefine them or just cynically mock them.
When liberals were cockier about their political fortunes, they were quick to demean certain Christians as "largely poor, uneducated and easy to command" or the "American Taliban."
Don't get me wrong. The Left is still making fun of Christians, but they've gotten a little cagier. Now they're claiming a slice of the pie for themselves, saying they are the true Christians and decrying Republicans for trying to assert a monopoly on Christianity. Well, I guess we're making some progress.
Ever since the mostly bizarre presidential exit polls signaled the importance of "values" among voters, Democrats have been scrambling to devise a way to work themselves seamlessly into that "demographic." So far, it doesn't appear they've even convinced themselves, but they're still working on it. Several recent news items illustrate the point.
Howard Dean has been making a lot of noise since his triumphal ascension to the chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee. But when it comes to values – at least traditional ones – the poor guy, like the party he represents, is painfully ambivalent at best.
During the DNC meeting on Friday, a lady from the Women's Caucus asked the irascible governor (don't call him "chairman") why those Republicans keep prattling on about "moral values." The Dean of Scream responded: "When they don't have any, is that what you mean?"
Mad Howard didn't stop there. He likened Republicans to "Pharisees and Sadducees" whose hypocrisy Jesus denounced. He also said Jesus' teachings about the difficulty of a rich man entering the kingdom of God weren't "part of the Republican platform."
Apparently wanting to demonstrate he was conversant with the Old Testament as well, Howard snuck in an allusion to Moses' wilderness wanderings in describing the Republicans' recently ended minority status. He said, "Republicans wandered around in the political wilderness for 40 years before they took back Congress." Are we to assume – fittingly – that the new DNC "governor" equates Congress to the Promised Land?
Howard is not the only Democrat protesting the Republicans' supposed identification with Scripture. Alabama state Rep. Alvin Holmes defiantly promised to give $700 (now it's up to $5,000 I hear) to any person who could show him a biblical passage expressing that marriage is between man and woman. When someone took him up on it, Holmes said, "Anybody could have any interpretation they want of the Bible, and that's not my interpretation." I suppose it should not surprise us that in this postmodern era with its full frontal assault on truth, people – even some who call themselves Christians – will say that Scripture says anything we want it to say.
Riding to the rescue of these gentlemen is Rev. Jim Wallis, who has written a book, "God's Politics," in which he reportedly provides ammunition to the political Left to reclaim the evangelical voter.
I haven't yet read the book, but according to a Chicago Tribune story on it, Wallis takes conservatives to task for their inattention to poverty and other issues. "How did the faith of Jesus come to be known as pro-rich, pro-war, and only pro-American?" asks Wallis.
Such mischaracterizations, reveal, at the very least the naivete of the politically liberal Christian. Conservative Christians advocate free-market and constitutional principles they believe (and history has proven) will do more to eradicate poverty than any other system. That they don't subscribe to the failed strategies of socialism doesn't mean they are less compassionate toward the poor.
No conservative Christian I know is pro-war or "only pro-American." But most of them support "just wars" and wars to protect our national security, which they don't believe require the permission of other nations. They also reject the liberals' definition of "unilateral" military actions as those unsupported by the French, Germans and Russians.
The Democratic leadership should understand that it won't endear itself to many Christian voters by rewriting Scripture, embracing relativism, facilitating a culture of death, endorsing homosexuality as a civil right, portraying government-coerced redistributions of other people's money as acts of compassion toward the poor and preaching class warfare notwithstanding the commandment against "coveting."
Far be it from me to assert, on behalf of political conservatives, a monopoly on Christianity. But I would humbly suggest that if Democrats want to avoid digging themselves into a deeper values quagmire, they would be well advised to pursue a different approach, one that doesn't involve recasting Christian values and rewriting Scripture.
The three C's - Conservatives, Christians, Capitalists drive the libs crazy.
At the televised DNC "meeting" a so-called "reverend" gave a "benediction." The Democrat "reverend" quoted scripture from Jeremiah, inserting "Republicans" whenever the text refered to "evil people"--and she exhorted Howard Dean to be strong and take them on.
Howard Dean nodded happily and gracefully accepted this so-called benediction. Dean then proclaimed Republicans lack moral values. "How can Republicans get to talk about moral values when they don't have any?" Dean asked condescendingly. "I don't want to hear any lectures about Christian values from the Republican Party — they are the Pharisees and the Sadducees," Dean said — referring to religious sects condemned by Jesus, who Christ referred to as a "brood of vipers."
Clearly, loser Dumbocrats--out in the cold with a dwindling voter base---will need this "brood of vipers"---Republicans of faith----to win anything. Now the Dims are sending out mixed signals; Hillary slithers slowly to the right, while Chairman Howie declares war on Christians. They can't have it both ways.
Howard oughta study up on American history, and heed the words of distinguished early Americans:
"Christianity is part of the Common, or Natural Law. Therefore it is Christianity that is the basis of our government. Religion of any other type is not synonymous with the American experience of Liberty!" Justice James Wilson signer of the Declaration, the Constitution, Original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court, and the father of the first organized legal training in America.
"It is the duty as well as the privilege and interest for our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians to be their representatives, as this is a Christian republic." Justice John Jay Supreme Court Justice
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was not founded by religionists, but by Christians, not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum prosperity, and freedom of worship here." Patrick Henry
Very nice.
IMHO, GOD (R)
As someone once said, God may not be a Republican, but Satan is almost certainly a democrat.
"...Jesus' teachings about the difficulty of a rich man entering the kingdom of God weren't "part of the Republican platform."
The 'rich man' in question was a miser and selfish, not to mention underhanded and greedy. Don't "red staters" donate more than "blue staters" to charity?
Republicans and the "promised land?"
Yes, and when the Israelites got there they ousted the heathens who had squatted in their lands and set up the knigdom of God's people on Earth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.