That could apply to evolution and natural selection, you know. Hidden in plain sight.
Not so hidden that I can't "see" them, js1138. I accept both evolution and natural selection as perfectly credible. The first is the way of the universe, and the second is a strategy that the evolutionary process employs. But the Darwinist model does not explain how matter "got smart" enough to drive the process all by itself. And I simply strongly doubt that it can. Until this piece of the puzzle is in place, although Darwinism has a good explanation for speciation, it has nothing to say about how life arose in the universe: It cannot tell us what life is.