Flame away...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
2 posted on
02/09/2005 2:08:56 PM PST by
Fyscat
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Well, I know what Michael Savage will be talking about tonight.
3 posted on
02/09/2005 2:09:03 PM PST by
Huck
(I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Government accounting 101: any increase that is less than the projected increase is a "cut".
4 posted on
02/09/2005 2:09:51 PM PST by
kevkrom
(If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
I thought is was 2ooo, not 10000, besides, it's not FY2008 yet. And since when has the congress approved a Presidential budget, not that I can remember.
6 posted on
02/09/2005 2:11:13 PM PST by
txroadhawg
(Don't believe any statistics unless you made them up yourself)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
We could compensate for this loss by letting the civilian groups pick up the slack, won't happen.
7 posted on
02/09/2005 2:11:17 PM PST by
exnavy
(lead, follow or get out of the way)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
The shrunken increase reflects the lack of money for an army of border guards and the capacity to train them.Is there also a lack of money for an army of able-bodied welfare spongers?
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
100 million for the Polish army, squat for Americans on the border.
9 posted on
02/09/2005 2:11:35 PM PST by
junta
(If you must hate, hate an ideologue.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
How about a Civl Border Patrol, modeled after the Civil Air Patrol.
If they want cheap, pay volunteer per diem to patrol and watch the border.
Volunteers with airplanes or Pilots Licenses.
10 posted on
02/09/2005 2:11:47 PM PST by
agincourt1415
(4 More Years of NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN!)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Libs are trying to create a split between people like Rush limbuagh and Buchanon crowd and the rest of us.
I think it is more then clear that the socialization of America is the greatest threat to liberty. Tax relief, school choice, abolition of SS and Medicaid are all much , much, much more important.
12 posted on
02/09/2005 2:12:22 PM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/blackconservatism.htm)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
You don't have to add agents if youuse the military already on the payroll.
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Democrats were unhappy....We sure don't want them unhappy, now do we?
14 posted on
02/09/2005 2:14:05 PM PST by
digger48
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
We are doomed!
maybe it is time for a "We are Doomed" thread"
16 posted on
02/09/2005 2:17:30 PM PST by
Nachum
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
The budget for this year hasn't even been voted on yet.
17 posted on
02/09/2005 2:18:58 PM PST by
rdb3
(The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Look on the bright side, a head of Lettuce should get below a dollar again.
18 posted on
02/09/2005 2:19:50 PM PST by
Pro-Bush
(Can't afford Medical care? Thank an illegal alien.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
the National Intelligence Reform Act included the requirement to add 10,000 border patrol agents in the five years beginning with 2006. Bush didn't cut anything. The federal government uses a 5 year budget plan. My calender says it's still 2005. More deceitful and deceptive media reporting.
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Should read "...at least 2,000 per year."
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak; Chieftain
So maybe Bush figures....he'll throw this out to the Dim dogs, they jump on this...everyone will scream and he'll end up getting his borer patrol anyway and force the Dims to cut something else they really want. Gotcha!
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
He has more important things on his mind, like AIDS money for Africa.
24 posted on
02/09/2005 2:44:25 PM PST by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
The shrunken increase reflects the lack of money for an army of border guards and the capacity to train them, officials said. That is because the budget spends over $1 tillion on social welfare.
Bush lacks courage, or he lacks the desire to protect America's sovereignty.
Possibly, it is because Bush is a globalist who dreams of Mexamerica.
Possibly, he would, in the grand tradition of Marxists, rather spend money on social welfare than natioanl security.
Choose your pick--it is one of the above.
26 posted on
02/09/2005 2:46:41 PM PST by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson