Posted on 02/09/2005 7:35:49 AM PST by PatrickHenry
These evo/creo threads are so predictable: they start out with some reasonable and well-mannered discussion, then the creationists are ridiculed and consequently leave, and then the anti-creationists laugh to each other how stooopid and corrupt the creationists are....
Such fallacious communication by those who supposedly hold science and logic in high regard....
If the creationists want to avoid ridicule then they should avoid making ridiculous posts.
"The Designer" virtually never designs anything really new. That makes perfect evolutionary sense, but far less ID sense.
Before any given mythological event didn't happen, it's hard to say what conditions were. But penguins live on and near Antarctica. And the North Pole, if it ever warmed up, would be ocean.
The ancestors of penguins, then, may have lived anywhere.
My guess would be Antarctica, which has drifted to the south pole of Earth via plate tectonics from regions far to the north. This transition happened at a speed far below "glacial."
"Intelligent Designing" must be like theoretical physics is said to be -- a young man's game. After a few billion years, the thrill has worn off, and the Designer just keeps recycling the old stuff.
The little guy on the far left is kind of pretty.
Ah, yes ... the roots of sexual attraction go way back, my dear.
So the boy fruit fly says to the girl fruit fly, "Hey, wanna come upstairs and look at my spots?"
I think that the point jenny was trying to make (and she can correct me if I'm wrong) was that if the flood were literally true, then the surviving pair of koalas, for example, would have had to travel from Mt Ararat to Australia. Why would modern koalas then be found only in Australia, and not at any points in between Mt Ararat and Australia? Plate techtonics doesn't help here. Plate techtonics maintains that Australia and Asia were once part of the same land mass, not that Mt Ararat and Australia were near each other at any time.
My pet drosophila melanogaster recently morphed into an anteater. Gee, Darwin was right!
"My pet drosophila melanogaster recently morphed into an anteater. Gee, Darwin was right!"
Darwin was right in most things he proposed. You on the other hand don't understand what evolution is and your attempt at humor above demonstrates that.
Instead of ridiculing evolution, why don't you tell us support for your position? I have never seen one scientific argument for ID, creation science or whatever bogus idea you think is in the Bible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.