[Clive]

-

[sgtbono2002]

Never. allow this band of sick twisted perverted individuals to normalise their sickness by calling what they do a marriage.It is a sex act and not too healthy a one at that.

[proud American in Canada]

One of the arguments that the Liberals make is that "my marriage isn't changed by allowing gays to marry. I still love my wife..." etc.

This misses the point. It's not a question of the impact it will have on individual relationships, but on society and ultimately, on the ability of heterosexuals to have the religious sacrament of marriage.

Because the Liberals' promises that changing the definition of marriage won't affect churches are just not believable.

Gays will sue to be married in the Church, they will win, and if it wants to stand by its beliefs, the Church will just stop marrying people.

Furthermore, changing the definition of marriage DOES affect my personal relationships. It doesn't affect my marriage, but it certainly affects how I am able to explain the concept of love, marriage and family to my children.

[goldstategop]

The Liberals back in 1998 opposed same sex marriage. They went along with what the courts wanted. Popular opinion wasn't exactly crying for the adoption of gay marriage across Canada. It wasn't enacted by the elected representatives of the people. The abomination was imposed upon Canada by arrogant judges who believed their values overrode that of the Canadian people.

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

[MadIvan]

Canada may be the next domino to fall in the Conservative Revolution. Martin is doing a bang-up job in making the Liberals unelectable for a long time to come.

Once it occurs, Canada will be warmly welcomed back into the Coalition.

Regards, Ivan