Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK police release Guantanamo four
BBC World News ^ | 26 Jan 2005 | BBC News

Posted on 01/26/2005 1:46:29 PM PST by Cornpone

The four British men who returned home from Guantanamo Bay on Tuesday have been released without charge by police.

Moazzam Begg, Martin Mubanga, Feroz Abbasi and Richard Belmar were due to leave Paddington Green police station on Wednesday night, Scotland Yard said.

They had been questioned by anti-terrorist officers in the UK after being held at the camp in Cuba for three years.

The men had been accused by the US of having links to al-Qaeda.

Family reunion

They are now being reunited with their families at a location of their choice, police said.

A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "Shortly before 9pm four men arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 on January 25 were released without charge.

"This followed liaison between police and the Crown Prosecution Service."

He said the men had been interviewed by anti-terrorist officers after being arrested under section 41 of the act, which referred to the alleged involvement in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.

Mr Abbasi, 24, Mr Belmar, 25, Mr Mubanga, 32, all from London and Mr Begg, 36, from Birmingham, returned to the UK on Tuesday evening in an RAF plane.

Washington had claimed all four were "enemy combatants" who trained at camps run by al-Qaeda.

The Pentagon says they were freed after the UK government promised they would not be a threat to the national security of the US or any of its allies.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abbasi; alqaeda; begg; belmar; britons; detainees; eurabia; eurotrash; feroz; gitmo; guantanamo; guantanamo4; guantanamofour; martin; moazzam; mubanga; richard; terror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
Maybe its a joke?
1 posted on 01/26/2005 1:46:30 PM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

The BBC is having mental orgasm about this.


2 posted on 01/26/2005 1:48:55 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Heroes of Britain


3 posted on 01/26/2005 1:49:19 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
"The BBC is having mental orgasm about this."

Probably but maybe not. I'm sure they're frustrated there was no way to "sex up" the story. Its already maximally obscene. Less than 36 hours in custody? Maybe they're just bait.

4 posted on 01/26/2005 1:51:45 PM PST by Cornpone (Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Hit'em in the Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

"four British men"

These maggots may have British passports, but they're not British. Their only allegiance is to their terrorist comrades and their demented religious views.


5 posted on 01/26/2005 1:57:23 PM PST by free_european
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_european

I really really really wish the government had terminated these creeps before ever bringing them to Gitmo. Who'd notice the difference?


6 posted on 01/26/2005 1:58:52 PM PST by Sterm26 (Blue State Captives unite!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

Couldn't agree more!


7 posted on 01/26/2005 2:11:46 PM PST by free_european
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: free_european
"These maggots may have British passports, but they're not British. Their only allegiance is to their terrorist comrades and their demented religious views."

Agreed. Islamists have no nationality as they are all members of the 'Umma', or the world Islamic community. This is where the west errs, to confuse religion with Islam. Islam or, more properly Islamism, is a neo-fascist movement bent on destruction of the nation-state and world domination.

8 posted on 01/26/2005 2:17:04 PM PST by Cornpone (Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Hit'em in the Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

The brits will watch these lads closely, don't worry, be happy!


9 posted on 01/26/2005 2:47:53 PM PST by damncat (No matter how much the cats fight, there always seem to be plenty of kittens. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_european

The passport is moreimportant than any religion or race.
It ensures that the British govt will look after you.
The Americans should treat any holder of the British passport with the same deferrence that is given to the US passport.

John Walker Lindh did not go to Gitmo and neither should these guys. They should have either shot them or given to the British.


10 posted on 01/26/2005 2:53:08 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Why? The US has been releasing Gitmo detainees over the years. Back in 2003 the US released 27 under the premise of

"..in consultation with other senior U.S. government officials, determined that these detainees either no longer posed a threat to U.S. security or no longer required detention by the United States."


11 posted on 01/26/2005 3:06:35 PM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

"They should have either shot them or given to the British."

I'd rather they'd have been shot (after interrogation). Britain's record on dealing with terrorists - both foreign and domestic - is unenviable.


12 posted on 01/26/2005 3:16:56 PM PST by free_european
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

I thought the Brits were on our side? I guess not.


13 posted on 01/26/2005 3:18:21 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_european

It may seem that way. But most of the open supporters of AL quaeda and the like are in our pay.

For the British it is a case of pride over the power of our passport. And also the lack of getting a fair trial did not help. Had it been in a US court then no one would have cared.


14 posted on 01/26/2005 3:19:17 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Well the Bush admin released them to the BRits so maybe Bush is not on our side either.


15 posted on 01/26/2005 3:19:47 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

Well considering a few of them were actually innocent of any connection to terrorism I do not think that would be a good idea.


17 posted on 01/26/2005 3:36:13 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

The four:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/01/12/wguan212.xml


18 posted on 01/26/2005 3:37:14 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingsurfer

Actually, according to the report I heard yesterday, we released them to the Brits after they promised us they would not be in a position to harm the U.S. again.


19 posted on 01/26/2005 3:37:26 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

A report from the Whitehouse or from the media?


20 posted on 01/26/2005 3:38:01 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson