[WildTurkey]

I am saying, and the Bible clearly indicates, that God made Adam name the animals so that Adam could realize that he was alone.

Oh, the old "read the bible literally but now I need a "liberal interpretation" to get my self out of a corner trick.

[JohnnyM]

The reading of Genesis that I supplied is not a liberal one but a literal one. But you fail to realize that YOU are the one claiming God failed in His task of providing Adam a helper in the form of animals.

Although the logic that somehow one must read the Bible as all literal or all figurative is severely flawed, but I digress.

JM