Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EricT.; Doohickey; fastattacksailor; CholeraJoe; MeekOneGOP
The job is completely different for technical disciplines submarine repair, nuclear maintenance, and combat systems (likewise auxiliary systems and weapons handling to a different level).

The officers' jobs isn't to "DO" the work, but to verify it - make sure the people DOING it are safe, the job is secure and is being done right, and the ship/system is safe DURING the job and will operate OK for the next thirty years (or until it's ripped apart for maintenance again!).

There are a few officers who can legitimately "critique" the technical performance of what's going on: these officers are rare, but THAT part of the job (the technical operations and people part and training for the next operator) is the chief's/LPO job. But an officer has three roles different than the average guy:

1. Tactical command and offensive operations. Sit on the fire control panels up front, keep the operational charts and the maps and the ship's course correct to fight. Fighter pilots are up front fighting the same way.

!a. With that are all the "combat support" supervision and emergency reaction stuff: coordinating the DC parties or landing craft on a surface ship, moving airplanes, or fire fighting crews, ....

2. Next is people/division officer stuff: training and personnel and support of the LPO. Keeping the division running (and hopefully) keeping the brass off of the troops so the troops can get routine stuff done.

3. Last (most important?) is QA. Making sure stuff gets done. More important, that it gets done right without killing people or breaking eqpt. That the job is done on time, within budget (yeah right) and to the right specs.

---

So, given all these conflicts, and the VERY LITTLE experience (and judgment) of the typical 4-6 year old officer, how does he/she learn when the bend the rules, when to enforce them, and when to IMMEDIATELY get help or authority?

From the LPO and chiefs. But these guys also can make mistakes.

---

But as Reactor Controls Officer or SubSafe Controls Officer, or Top Secret Control Officer, or Crypto Controls Officer, (or Navigator updating charts of the Pacific near Guam!.....) "I" (me, not the petty officer) am responsible that the weekly reactor check numbers are correct and meet specs. That the daily and monthly crypto destruction is ACTUALLY done right (and not just radio'ed off at the end of the month with 32 identical signatures!), that the records are signed off, and that the thing will work.

Doohickey, FAS - Anything to correct in this?
167 posted on 01/27/2005 10:51:34 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

here's what she's supposed to look like
http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0871104.jpg


168 posted on 01/27/2005 12:47:07 PM PST by passingthought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Next is people/division officer stuff: training and personnel and support of the LPO. Keeping the division running (and hopefully) keeping the brass off of the troops so the troops can get routine stuff done.

I relished working for officers/CPO's with this attitude. I would do just about anything for this type of people, and always to the best of my ability. The last one I worked for was an LDO ensign. Last time I saw him, he was SUBPAC EMO.

169 posted on 01/27/2005 2:40:58 PM PST by EricT. (Join the Soylent Green Party...We recycle dead environmentalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson