Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

'So a dog sniffing your car for a particular oder it has been trained to identify is NOT a seach. In what alternate Universe?'

I don't know, but I agree that it's not this universe and so does the Court. As I've repeatedly pointed out, the SCOTUS does _not_ claim that a dog sniff is 'NOT a sea[r]ch'.


680 posted on 01/25/2005 9:15:31 AM PST by MisterKnowItAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies ]


To: MisterKnowItAll
Their ruling specifically holds that the type of search at issue in this case is not subject to the Fourth Amendment and therefore does not require a warrant.

As I've repeatedly pointed out, the SCOTUS does _not_ claim

Make up your mind.

683 posted on 01/25/2005 9:18:44 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

To: MisterKnowItAll
no right to detain me to the point of calling in drug dogs

He wasn't detaining you - he was conducting a search that you consented to. Nowhere in post 531 do you state that you withdrew your consent. You should have, and then gone merrily on your way.

694 posted on 01/25/2005 9:38:44 AM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson