So it is all peachy keen as long as the SCOTUS goes about redefining plain English? Wasn't there someone else trying to redefine the word "is" that we came down rather hard on as well?
'So it is all peachy keen as long as the SCOTUS goes about redefining plain English?'
I can't answer that question adequately without knowing what 'plain English' word(s) you think the Court is redefining. I've already pointed out that they _don't_ redefine 'search' to exclude dog sniffs (and I wouldn't think it was all right if they did). What did you have in mind here?