Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius6961
I guess that's the issue: many here, including me, think that the criticism was less than "honest" on the part of Noonan and Buckley, and that it smacked of having to be "critical" to be relevant. Certainly Noonan's carping about "too much God" is silly, and I'm sure it strikes most conservatives as such.

There is a time and place for everything: Rush rightly criticized Bush roundly on many occasions, but to "pile on" with the Left---especially when the criticisms were 180 degrees opposite, well, that's something only an elite member of the media does, even a conservative elite member of the media.

245 posted on 01/21/2005 3:35:16 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news (there is no c in Amtrak and no truth in MSM news))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: LS
Precisely, LS. It is the disingenuosness of Noonan that caused my criticism of her column.

Buckley, OTOH, just lacks vision, even in his brilliance, and that's where his critique comes from.

But great men of vision......both Reagan and Bush 43......are unaffected by the criticism of those who can't see what they see.

249 posted on 01/21/2005 3:41:48 PM PST by ohioWfan (Have you PRAYED for your President today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson