[ohioWfan]

Another question.

Why is it "groupthink" to agree with the President along with others, and NOT "groupthink" to disagree along with others?

It seems that all of you who disagree with the President are participating in "groupthink" with each other.

Is it not possible that the two "groups" just have different opinions from each other?

[exhaustedmomma]

If I thought for a skinny-minute you were seriously wanting to discuss or debate, I'd gladly answer your question. However, my experience with you has been circular arguments that amount to nonproductive bickering.

Clue--- to your question --- research the dynamics of group think.

[LibertarianInExile]

It's growing obvious you're intentionally missing the point to score a few. It's not groupthink to agree with the President. It's groupthink to find it acceptable to abuse the person of someone simply because they disagree with some point the President makes or don't like his style. Your attempts to turn those 'thin-lipped, jealous bitch' comments into some sort of reasonable, responsible advocacy for the President are sad, because that's what you came here to defend, and you know it.