Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile; iconoclast; MEG33; arasina
Wow. I went to see Phantom of the Opera (pretty good, btw), and came back to see that the 'dialogue' had sunk even farther into the depths of name calling.

One of the posts had even been yanked by the mod before I got to see it. Rats. I do so love to be insulted with impunity.

So much for the exchange of intellectual ideas with fellow freepers, eh?

When you boys get beaten in the realm of ideas, you turn to potty language. Really cool.......both of you. We're all impressed.

784 posted on 01/22/2005 7:04:20 PM PST by ohioWfan (Have you PRAYED for your President today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan; cyncooper; iconoclast; MEG33; JeffAtlanta; exhaustedmomma; Palladin; Fenris6; ...

After reading comments like post 21, then fifty-odd "jealousy, thy name is Noonan" posts, I and a few other poor souls posit that Noonan should be allowed to speak her mind about Bush's address, and that people shouldn't reflexively insult her just because they disagree with her review of this speech, that blind allegiance is foolhardy.

You and your pinged pals call us idiots and tell us we must be joking. You tell us that we're only saying there are blind followers here because WE are personally bitter, and offensive to boot.

Then you act as if we should not reply in kind to comments like that. Someone on the 'bot side goes crying to the mods when you get a taste of what you dish out. The "neener-neener-you-got-pulled-so-you're-guilty" post to which I'm replying is a prime example of a love some of you have for hounding those with whom you disagree, insulting them until you find something offensive enough in their replies to bitch to the mods. Meanwhile, you consider the insults you're lobbing back and forth with your opposition the "exchange of intellectual ideas," and that you are the reasonable parties, while your opening and further posts are insulting us all the way. I always enjoy the laugh when you do actually post something to the effect of this last post, that we're "beaten in the realm of ideas." Let me know when you find a single one of us who agrees with that pie-in-the-sky post.

The worst part is that we AREN'T your opposition and weren't insulting YOU at all--unless you all self-identify with people who ARE blind followers. I speak for myself, but I wouldn't be surprised at all to find I speak for others, when I say again that I am only criticizing and attacking the folks who insult Noonan instead of addressing her comments, or insult me. While you and your pals don't seem to think we have any right to even DEFEND her ability to comment without joining DU, and that Noonan should join DU for her sacrilege in criticizing Bush, too, we agree that YOU have an absolute right to disagree with her. But calling her jealous and no conservative and ugly, and calling us idiots or bitter or worse is just not at all what discussion and debate are about. We have every right to demonstrate disdain for those people who believe that debate is about making sure you get to yell loud insults--and instead make ours the louder insult--as opposed to attempting to reason with people who have shown they don't appreciate or understand reasonable discussion at all. That any of you identify with those people who cannot attack her ideas without attacking her person speaks volumes as to your true 'reasonableness.'


785 posted on 01/23/2005 1:40:16 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson