Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America, not Johnson needs pardon (black boxer Jack Johnson)
Aberdeen American News ^ | January 19, 2005 | Leonard Pitts, Jr.

Posted on 01/20/2005 11:28:41 AM PST by EveningStar

Jack Johnson was a black man who often spent his days beating up white men and his nights making love to white women. This, in the first years of the last century.

So you can understand why he was a polarizing figure, why newspapers inveighed against him and the government conspired to bring him down.

Of course, chances are good that you've never even heard of John Arthur Johnson. As filmmaker Ken Burns pointed out to me in a telephone interview, we are a nation of great historical illiteracy. Ask most people what they know about even so towering a figure as George Washington and you're likely to hear only myths.

"If George Washington can get lost," said Burns, "then Jack Johnson can get lost."

Monday night on PBS, Burns set out to find him. The result is a two-part biography, "Unforgivable Blackness: The Rise and Fall of Jack Johnson," that offers a compelling exploration of a singular life.

Johnson was a fighter. He became the first black heavyweight champion in 1908 with an easy knockout of Tommy Burns.

This was at a time when the physical superiority of white men over black ones was widely regarded as self-evident truth, so Johnson's victory was an electric shock to the American psyche. And he kept winning, each victory another poke in the eye for the lie of white supremacy. Former champion Jim Jeffries - five years retired and many pounds overweight - was called upon as the "great white hope" who would put Johnson back in his place. Johnson toyed with him for 15 rounds, then decked him.

No black man with any sense dared look too pleased. As it was, angry whites rioted across the country. Eight people died.

What made matters worse is that Johnson was, as Burns puts it, "the original gangsta," living a bling-bling lifestyle 90 years before that term was coined. In an era that required black men to be circumspect, he was a brash fellow who didn't mind flaunting his wealth. He lived high, drove fast. And if he was attracted to a white woman and she to him, he saw no reason they should not be together. Indeed, he had a bad habit of marrying them.

It all came to a head in 1913, when Johnson was convicted of violating the Mann Act, which made it a federal crime to transport a woman across state lines for illegal purposes. Johnson's "illegal purpose" was to have sex with a white woman.

Not that the government bothered to hide the racism of its motive. As the prosecutor said after the verdict, "This Negro, in the eyes of many, has been persecuted. Perhaps as an individual he was. But it was his misfortune to be the foremost example of the evil in permitting the intermarriage of whites and blacks."

Burns, aided by Sens. John McCain and Edward Kennedy, is petitioning the president for a posthumous pardon on Johnson's behalf. Consider this column my way of adding my name to the list.

Still, I have issues with that word, "pardon," which suggests Johnson requires forgiveness for doing something wrong. His only mistake, if you want to call it that, was in believing that he was a man free like other men, to define himself as he saw fit, live his life on his own terms.

You hear echoes of his story in the stories of O.J. Simpson, Terrell Owens and in a hundred stories that have nothing to do with white women and sex and everything to do with the simple freedom to be.

"Jack Johnson decided to live his life nothing short of a free man," says Burns. "And this is a story of how this country went after him for doing what the Constitution said he had the right to do."

That's why I think we need to be straight about this. It would be good to see Johnson's name cleared. But it's America that should be asking for a pardon.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigotry; boxing; criminal; jackjohnson; kenburns; mannact; pardon; racism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

1 posted on 01/20/2005 11:28:47 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mhking; rdb3; cyborg

ping


2 posted on 01/20/2005 11:29:34 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
You hear echoes of his story in the stories of O.J. Simpson, Terrell Owens and in a hundred stories that have nothing to do with white women and sex and everything to do with the simple freedom to be.

Yeah, blame racism 90 years ago for the slaughter of two innocents and letting the killer go free...

3 posted on 01/20/2005 11:33:43 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

4 posted on 01/20/2005 11:34:22 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
What made matters worse is that Johnson was, as Burns puts it, "the original gangsta," living a bling-bling lifestyle 90 years before that term was coined.

At least one big difference with Johnson. Unlike today's gangstas, Johnson spoke in full, fluent, intelligent English.

I really enjoyed part one of this film. Another top-notch "Florentine Film."

5 posted on 01/20/2005 11:34:27 AM PST by Petronski (Alles klar, Herr Kommissar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Ping!


6 posted on 01/20/2005 11:34:45 AM PST by NRA2BFree (Before and after pictures of the tsunami: http://homepage.mac.com/demark/tsunami/9.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

"angry whites rioted across the country. Eight people died"

We've come full circle-54 died in LA after the first Rodney King verdict. The more things change, the more they stay the same.


7 posted on 01/20/2005 11:35:00 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
You hear echoes of his story in the stories of O.J. Simpson,

I'm going to let that one speak for itself.

8 posted on 01/20/2005 11:35:24 AM PST by atomicpossum (I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I celebrate the story of Jack Johnson because he was living proof that America was so racist that they would never tolerate such a man.

He did all that he did and lived to enjoy it openly because we are a nation of laws, and Jack Johnson had to be entrapped by law to get him.

It is sad that he was treated this way, but like some drunk flashing money downtown, he did nothing to avoid that persecution, like an idiot.

But if we were the Naxis then that so many leftists claim we are, then how did Jack Johnson get away with his overt behavior for so long?

The neoMarxist academians would never have allowed him to do so, nor would the Nazis or the Communists.

So no matter how 'bad' one wants to paint America of the segregated era, at least there was enough freedom then for a guy like Jack Johnson to piss everybody off.

A tip of the hat to ole Jack Johnson!


9 posted on 01/20/2005 11:35:50 AM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JFK_Lib

Corection: Should have read -
I celebrate the story of Jack Johnson because he was living proof that America was NOT so racist that they would never tolerate such a man.


10 posted on 01/20/2005 11:37:17 AM PST by JFK_Lib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JFK_Lib
Excellent analysis. My compliments.
11 posted on 01/20/2005 11:38:20 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

An interesting piece, up until the OJ inclusion destroyed the author's credibility. Hundreds of *better* examples available.


12 posted on 01/20/2005 11:38:43 AM PST by whee0071
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
One of the top three heavyweights of all time, to be sure. Too bad Jim Jefferies chose not to fight Johnson until long after he had relinquished his title and was forced to do so (to restore "honor" to the "white race"). Ex-champ Jefferies had to lose 100 lbs for the fight, and hadn't fought in six years. ....and Johnson made him pay, bigtime. Those two fighting at their primes would've been something else. .....although considering Johnson's incredible defensive skills and considerable reach advantage the ultimate outcome probably would've been the same.

I'm not a Ken Burns fan (to put it mildly), but the photos and films he excavates are second to none.

13 posted on 01/20/2005 11:38:54 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

What's done is done. There are a lot of people who lived out similar circumstances and we will never hear of their stories. What are you going to do really? It's 2005 and America is a VERY different place from 1913.


14 posted on 01/20/2005 11:39:08 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Right, Ken. We're all so stupid. Only you know the truth.


15 posted on 01/20/2005 11:39:18 AM PST by NotSoFreeStater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

"You hear echoes of his story in the stories of O.J. Simpson,"

I know he did not just put OJ in the same story as Jack Johnson. What a fool.


16 posted on 01/20/2005 11:39:19 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

There's no way they're the same. You're right. What an idiot! LOL


17 posted on 01/20/2005 11:40:27 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I remember reading some blurb from a boxing writer about sending letters to congress to petition for Johnson's pardon. I sent several letters out that night. I was waiting for the press to pick the story and run with it , but no such luck. I am sure he would have got the media attention if he were some loudmouth lefty who denounced America at every turn(Harry Belafonte).
18 posted on 01/20/2005 11:40:52 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Somehow I can't imagine one of today's bling-bling gangstas speaking with eloquence such as this:

"White people often point to the writings of Booker T. Washington as the best example of a desirable attitude on the part of the colored population. I have never been able to agree with the point of view of Washington, because he has to my mind not been altogether frank in the statement of the problems or courageous in his solution to them…I have found no better way of avoiding race prejudice than to act with people of other races as if prejudice did not exist."

- Jack Johnson

19 posted on 01/20/2005 11:42:59 AM PST by Petronski (Alles klar, Herr Kommissar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I hope this does not sound racist but I think the term pardon would be appropriate. He was convicted of breaking a law. That law may have been wrong and unjust but it was a law. So pardon would be the correct term.

"You hear echoes of his story in the stories of O.J. Simpson, Terrell Owens and in a hundred stories that have nothing to do with white women and sex and everything to do with the simple freedom to be."

This is just garbage!
20 posted on 01/20/2005 11:43:20 AM PST by USMCBOMBGUY (Mad as hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson