And again, pick any modern achievement. The achievement cannot avoid riding on the back of a great creation scientists inspired brilliance.
The achievements today are only made because the understanding of the physical laws that technology is based were overwhelmingly formulated by Creationists.
As Bill O'Reilly asked the scientist opposed to evolutionary disclaimers and including ID theory in classrooms, "What if God really did create the world?" he asked. "Wouldnt that be science?"
Come on, these guys have got all the advantages, according to you. Where are their achievements?
Given that you define ALL science as creation science "All real world science is creation science" (your post #413 on this thread), then by definition, all scientific achievements have to be made by creation scientists.
It kind of looks tautological, eh? Not very informative.