SpongeBob, Barney promote 'gay tolerance (FedEx to Sponsor in Gov't Schools)

WorldNetDaily ^ | January 6, 2005

[weegee]

Ask Lou Reed. He claims that he and some male buddies used to give each other oral sex out of desperation.

Dee Dee Ramone was a junkie who would hustle as a male prostitute to get a fix. He never had a "boyfriend", he always had girlfriends.

These are "teens" and young adults.

[stands2reason]

You don't have to be a Christian to see what is abnormal and unhealthy or not.

[weegee]

Some also think that we should "respect" the "bravery" of the 9/11 hijackers and even of "brilliant" Nazi soldiers.

I prefer not to honor the "cunning" skills of a serial rapist/murderers like Ted Bundy or Richard Speck.

Vile acts are not worthy of "respect". Perspective can change "who is right" but on the whole, society/mankind is in agreement when some people serve the cause of evil.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

You get the picture all right...

It seems quite hypocritical for homosexuals to desire forcing a monogamous standard on everyone, after all they do complain about certain other standards being "religious" zealotry - - monogamy is an Adam and Eve model, isn't it???

[Joe Republc]

Anybody know what the heck Barney and SpongeBob will be saying to promote 'tolerance' with respect to sexual identity?

Part of me hopes that whatever they CAN say will be so watered down it will be pretty innocuous.

-- Joe

[MetalHeadConservative35]

spongebobs dead...i killed him and i have the video to prove it!

[stands2reason]

They know what they're doing. They don't want anything short of respect. If you don't approve of homosexuality, you're the one with the problem, even if you are courteous to them.

To them, being courteous but still unapproving is as bad as egging their houses. In fact, if given the choice, they'd rather have the latter-- they can't be "victims" if you're courteous.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

"Tolerate" means to NOT kill...

[weegee]

John F./L. (Effin'Loser) Kerry was willing to tolerate a low nuisance level of terrorism against the United States.

Why didn't he say that he wanted to snuff out the Homosexual Agenda such that homosexuals could still exist in the world but that their presence would be reduced to a low nuisance level? When everyone marches to the beat of a different drummer, you don't have drumming, you have cacophonous noise. It is society's best interest (as well as the human race's best interest) to steer people to monogamous male-female relationships.

[nicmarlo]

Either we first establish as a premise of argument, and accept the fact that it takes (heterosexual relations) a secular standard of mammalian reproductive biology to define the nature of the debate in the temporal political sphere, or we allow the Left to advance their fallacies and cults of perversion...

Yes, on a biological level, each creature has its "set" role, function, and purpose.

As far as your comments on polygamy, I do not read that it was ever God's wish or primary desire that man have more than one wife. (He made them Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eves). He may have allowed polygamy to occur, as He did and does allow many other things that were/are ultimately hurtful or harmful to mankind (read that FREE WILL and HARDENED HEARTS), but that does not mean that it is or was His original plan (before the fall, when sin first occurred). For example, in

Matthew 19:3-9 (NASB)

3 And some Pharisees came to Him, testing Him, and saying, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause at all?"

4 And He answered and said, "Have you not read, that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,

5 and said, 'FOR THIS CAUSE A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND SHALL CLEAVE TO HIS WIFE; AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'?

6 "Consequently they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

7 They *said to Him, "Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?"

8 He *said to them, "Because of your hardness of heart, Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.

9 "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."

[Cogadh na Siths Girl]

Then you need to explain why so many adult male molesters(queer pedophiles) only go after male children as we have seen with the male priests, Micheal Jackson, Jeffrey Jones, etc.

Yes, i would, if it were only happening to boys, but that's not the case. i know a lot of women that are survivors of molestation, and they weren't molested by women. Of course queer pedophiles are going to go after boys, but not all pedophiles do, or we wouldn't have all the stories of young girls being abducted, abused, and found dead in a ditch.

[wardaddy]

Anti-Defamation League, Crown Theatres, Disney Channel, FedEx, Nickelodeon, HIT Entertainment, Nile Rodgers/Sony Publishing/The Bernard Edwards Estate/Warner Chapel, Nelvana, PBS, Scholastic, Sesame Workshop, Toni Mendez Shapiro Estate, and WGBH-TV in Boston.

A rogue's gallery of culture war leftists and Fed Ex too?

WTF is Freddie Smith...sleeping?

[wardaddy]

I liked you better as a bean.

[wardaddy]

Do you have any proof or links?

I would venture that pedophiles and pederasts are disproportionately homosexual far beyond their tiny percentage of the general population.

The fact that little girls are molested by men as pedophiles or pederasts does not detract from the first fact.

[Nightshift]

Added. i will let everyone know as soon as i get the advertisers updated

[nicmarlo]

thanks nightshift

[weegee]

Do you deny that there are women who molest boys AND those who molest girls?

[Cogadh na Siths Girl]

They have no business monkeying with school curriculum, or taking children to Gay Pride events(As happenened recently, with middle school children being exposed to disgusting perversions.), or putting on Gay Pride plays, or using popular educational/entertainment figures to push their own agenda.

i don't recall saying they did. As a matter of fact, i recall typing that i didn't agree with such issues being forced down people's throats.

The "violence" against gays is VASTLY exaggerated, and kindergarteners seldom commit violence, anyway

no, they don't, but i think the point is to address the issue before they get to the age where they might. No, i don't condon it. Yes i believe it is an issue that should be handled on the home-front, and that parents have the right to instill whatever values they choose in their children. But that doesn't mean i have to refuse to see, and understand, what the flip-side is trying to say. And it is a two sided issue, in which neither side is right or wrong. It is personal belief that puts you on one side or the other. And that is purely subjective.

[weegee]

Again, the results are probably skewed to prove what the researchers want, but there does seem to be a "complete" change.

Do women who've had an addadictomy produce sperm? Where is the functional womb in a shemale?

Merely cosmetic surgery.

You can take horomones found in abundance in members of the opposite sex without having any surgery.

Your DNA won't change, though.

Then we also have teens on hormonal suppression for "birth control" as their bodies go through puberty; changes that will affect them for their entire lives. Couldn't some of this mucking about result in poor body chemistry? It does not have to be "genetic".

[floriduh voter]

Well, I like spongebob but I'm not an impressionable child. My entire home office is decked out in spongebob.

That Barney now he's obnoxious.

That one purple teletubby is definitely gay but again, it's just a person in a purple costume. Kids become who they are before they are five years old. Who are these materials aimed at?