Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vaudine

Sure. that sounds plausible.

So before te Patriot Act was passed he wouldn't have been charged? Of coures he would have, but under what statutes?


90 posted on 01/05/2005 5:55:51 AM PST by eleni121 (4 more years and then 4 more again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121

There are laws about lasers near airports. The law sets up three zones, and each zone has a maximum power density.

IIRC, the closest zone is two miles, and it basically says "no laser beam", then the other zones are concentric. The outer zone is, I think, 6 microwatts of laser light per square centimeter. The law is set up to protect airports from outdoor laser shows or indistrial/scientific laser use.

If this guy met these guidelines, then there is "interfering with an aircraft" which includes bright lights, spotlights, searchlights, and lasers. There probably is a specific federal law that states that you can't shine a laser at an aircraft so that it bothers the pilots, but I'm not sure.

Then there are state and local laws- malicious mischief is a good broad category.

There are enough existing laws to convince this dude he had a lapse in judgement. I think the Patriot Act is an overkill; one that could backfire if the defense is on the ball.

When I have time I'll link to a post that has the limits and distances for airports and lasers.


93 posted on 01/05/2005 6:17:57 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson