Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Prepares to Re-Nominate Judges Blocked by Democrats
CNSNews ^ | Dec 24, 2004 | Randy Hall

Posted on 12/24/2004 8:19:21 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

President Bush will again nominate 20 persons for federal judgeships, even though Democrats previously used tactics such as filibusters to prevent them from being confirmed, the White House announced Thursday.

"The president nominated highly qualified individuals to the federal courts during his first term, but the Senate failed to vote on many nominations," White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said in a written statement.

"The Senate has a constitutional obligation to vote up or down on a president's judicial nominees," McClellan added, "and the president looks forward to working with the new Senate to ensure a well-functioning and independent judiciary."

Despite the Republican majority in the Senate, Democrats used filibusters to prevent final votes on 10 of Bush's 34 nominees to the federal appeals courts during the past two years.

And even though the GOP gained four seats in the Nov. 2 election, Republicans are still five votes short of the 60 needed to overcome further filibusters.

A final obstacle to the confirmations could be Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), who recently was voted chairman of the Judiciary Committee despite his statement that judges who oppose abortion would have a difficult time gaining Senate confirmation, given the opposition from Democrats.

"The president has decided to re-nominate many highly qualified and capable individuals to serve as federal judges," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.). "I look forward to working with Sen. Specter, other Judiciary Committee members and my colleagues to ensure quick action and up-and-down votes on these judicial nominees."

When the 109th Congress convenes on Jan. 4, the president will re-submit the names of the following 12 individuals for the U.S. Court of Appeals:

Terrence Boyle, 4th Circuit; Priscilla Owen, 5th Circuit; David McKeague, 6th Circuit; Susan Neilson, 6th Circuit; Henry Saad, 6th Circuit; Richard Griffin, 6th Circuit; William Pryor; 11th Circuit; William Myers III, 9th Circuit; Janice Brown, District of Columbia Circuit; Brett Kavanaugh, District of Columbia Circuit; William Haynes II, 4th Circuit; and Thomas Griffith, District of Columbia Circuit.

Of the 10 appeals court nominees blocked by the Democrats, four are not in Bush's new list of nominees for the federal bench.

After a long battle in the Senate, Charles Pickering, Sr., was named to the federal appeals court by the president in a recess appointment. However, on Dec. 9, Pickering announced his retirement, saying he would not seek a permanent seat on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

The other three are: Miguel Estrada, a native of Honduras and former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy; California judge Carolyn Kuhl; and Claude Allen, whose Virginia residency upset Maryland's senators because the post to which he was nominated on the 4th Circuit is usually held by a person from the Free State.

Bush intends to propose the following eight people to less-controversial U.S. District Court positions:

James Dever III, Eastern District, North Carolina; Thomas Ludington, Eastern District, Michigan; Robert Conrad, Western District, North Carolina; Daniel Ryan, Eastern District, Michigan; Peter Sheridan, New Jersey; Paul Crotty, Southern District, New York; Sean Cox, Eastern District, Michigan; and J. Michael Seabright, Hawaii.

'Extremely disappointed'

"I was extremely disappointed to learn today that the president intends to begin the new Congress by resubmitting extremist judicial nominees," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement.

"The Bush administration is ending the year as they began it, choosing confrontation over compromise, ideology over moderation, and defiance over cooperation," said Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee.

"On some of their controversial nominees, they may prevail because of their monopoly of power," Leahy added. "The big loser, however, will be the independence of our judicial branch of government."

Ralph Neas, director of the liberal organization People for the American Way, which worked to block several court appointments during the president's first tem, said that Bush's decision signaled a renewal of partisan warfare.

"The president and his team want to pack the federal courts with right-wing ideologues and roll back decades of progress in social justice," Neas stated.

'The dynamics of 2006'

On the other side of the political fence, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), another member of the Judiciary Committee, said he was encouraged by the president's plans to re-nominate the candidates.

"I hope they'll receive better treatment than they did in the last Congress," Cornyn said Thursday. "I think the American people sent a strong message on Nov. 2 against the obstructionist tactics that, unfortunately, we saw all too often in the past four years.

"The dynamics of 2006 are in play here," Cornyn added. "Those Democratic senators up for re-election in states Bush did very well in have to be looking at what happened to Tom Daschle in South Dakota and wondering if the same fate is in store for them if they continue to ... prevent up-or-down votes on the president's nominees."

Daschle's loss in the Nov. 2 election cost him both his Senate seat and the post of Senate minority leader.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; filibuster; judicialnominees

1 posted on 12/24/2004 8:19:21 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I was extremely disappointed to learn today that the president intends to begin the new Congress by resubmitting extremist judicial nominees," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement.

That must be incomplete. If it were a statement by a Republican, and if it were reported by the MSM, it would have included the Kreskin-like observation --

...indicating that the prospect of further losses of [Democrat] seats on the Senate is acceptable to him.

Dan

2 posted on 12/24/2004 8:22:42 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Hee-hee.


3 posted on 12/24/2004 8:23:04 AM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The Senate has a constitutional obligation to vote up or down on a president's judicial nominees," McClellan added, "and the president looks forward to working with the new Senate to ensure a well-functioning and independent judiciary."


4 posted on 12/24/2004 8:24:56 AM PST by glock rocks (Play an accordion, go to jail. It's the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Smiles from ear to ear here. Ahhhh.


5 posted on 12/24/2004 8:25:46 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The dem's are going to continue to make themselves even more irrelevant. It's going to be great to watch this all playout.
6 posted on 12/24/2004 8:26:21 AM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Republicans can't cave in after the nominees are pummelled in the hearings by the Dems.

I hope Frist is up to task. If he isn't, he may find himself on the outside looking in.

It's about time the Republicans govern, not try to please the Dems and the MSM. If they can't, they have nobody to blame but themselves and will be on the outside looking in.

Get rid of the POS Hastert too, I just heard him again last night sounding like a Dem on Chicago radio. What an embarassment!


7 posted on 12/24/2004 8:30:53 AM PST by wrathof59 (semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"I was extremely disappointed to learn today that the president intends to begin the new Congress by resubmitting extremist judicial nominees," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement.

Get used to it! You lost! Gentlemen, man your battle stations.

8 posted on 12/24/2004 8:36:05 AM PST by rapture-me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I was extremely disappointed to learn today that the president intends to begin the new Congress by resubmitting extremist judicial nominees," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement."

From saddened to disappointed.

My, that minority guy, Reid, is a breath of fresh air.

9 posted on 12/24/2004 8:36:32 AM PST by G.Mason (The replies by this poster are meant for self amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Have those Democrats that vote for a filibuster stand up and be judged during the 2006 senatorial elections.
Tom Daschle was unable to navigate around this issue, those up for reelection will without doubt discover their ultimate voter judgment.
10 posted on 12/24/2004 8:45:37 AM PST by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I'm overjoyed also..but wondering..why leak this now..on Christmas eve...only one answer comes to mind.. to piss off the Dems and the left/libs..ruin their holidays...make them ponder the imminent nuclear option..


11 posted on 12/24/2004 8:49:30 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her gene pool. Any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I was extremely disappointed to learn today that the president intends to begin the new Congress by resubmitting extremist judicial nominees," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in a statement.

"The Bush administration is ending the year as they began it, choosing confrontation over compromise, ideology over moderation, and defiance over cooperation," said Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee.

On the contrary, I thought that simply renominating the same candidates, rather than going with more conservative picks, was a pretty conciliatory move, given the outcome of the November election and the proven efficacy (NOT!) of compromising with the National Socialists (Democrats).

12 posted on 12/24/2004 9:11:30 AM PST by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We need to be busy during the Christmas break and let our representatives know what we want them to do when they go back to D.C. They tend to forget they are OUR representatives and need to be reminded frequently. And forceably at the polls if they don't function to our approval. They serve at OUR pleasure....some of us forget that.
13 posted on 12/24/2004 9:27:42 AM PST by momf ( Immigrant =came the correct way; IIlegal = criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

On the contrary, I thought that simply renominating the same candidates, rather than going with more conservative picks, was a pretty conciliatory move, given the outcome of the November election and the proven efficacy (NOT!) of compromising with the National Socialists (Democrats).
On the contrary, I thought that simply renominating the same candidates, rather than going with more conservative picks, was a pretty conciliatory move, given the outcome of the November election and the proven efficacy (NOT!) of compromising with the National Socialists (Democrats).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

National Socialists (Democrats).
Where they the Brown Shirts? I get my Nazi's in a knot some time! All Good Little Nazi's!!


14 posted on 12/24/2004 9:39:56 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I can just see Chuckie Schmuckie, Biden, Fat Teddy and Leahy all skulking in some dark, wet sewer office, schemeing on how to block, obstruct and derail the President's reasonable selections for these federal vacancies.

The dems have to decide to hold their hissy fit now or when the first Supreme retires. What Rove needs to do right now is get some likely 2006 Senate candidates who might oppose a sitting crapweasel to begin to make a lot of noise about what he'd do right when he replaces the extremist scumbag dem.

15 posted on 12/24/2004 9:50:45 AM PST by Tacis (Kerry - You Can't Make A Silk Purse Out Of A Lazy, Lying, Elitist Scumbag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Go for it President Bush...we support you!!!


16 posted on 12/24/2004 9:52:33 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"And even though the GOP gained four seats in the Nov. 2 election, Republicans are still five votes short of the 60 needed to overcome further filibusters."

Be sure to encourage the Leftists to keep up their hate-filled, anti-American rhetoric and propaganda and--especially at this Christmas time--their anti-Christmas and anti-Christian activities.

In other words, encourage the Left to continue revealing itself.

If they just stay on course, 2006 promises to be a banner year for the Republicans!

17 posted on 12/24/2004 10:11:27 AM PST by Savage Beast (This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson