Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonF

It seems to me that if this bill had been law prior to that case, it would have forbidden the case from being heard by the Supreme Court and thus the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court would have stood.
You are correct.

But you must consider:


69 posted on 12/23/2004 8:33:35 AM PST by Ed Current (U.S. Constitution, Article 3 has no constituency to break federal judicial tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Ed Current
"It was judges, not legislators, who ruled that sodomy is a constitutional right. Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003)."

What's that got to do with what I'm talking about? In Dale vs. BSA, it was the New Jersey legislature that passed a law giving sexual orientation equal status in N.J. State anti-discrimination law with race, etc.; this was not something imposed by judges.

79 posted on 12/23/2004 10:27:23 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson