[Names Ash Housewares]

"So, this is your comfortaing reflexive mantra in response to such puzzle pieces?"

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. That is my mantra.

[Quix]

WHICH, being interpreted is another way of saying you wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy prefer TYPE II errors to TYPE I errors--as illogical as that may be.

I know you naysayers have an addiction to TYPE II errors vs TYPE I.

But do you have to be so obnoxious about it?

BTW, by the time your extraordinary evidence is available, one's options will be severely lessened by associated events coinciding with said extraordinary evidence. Perhaps you'll be rejoicing at the coinciding events. If so, how long the rejoicing will continue remains to be seen. I don't think long. Probably not longer than 3.5 years.