im not saying he's innocent, but im definitely not saying he's guilty...i think i CAN say that many of the people accusing him probably do it just to have their faces posted in the media.
so if someone can prove to me why he's so GUILTY as people around here have already made him out to be, then i'll happily take back my comments.
He's as guilty as OJ, IMHO, and his trail will probably have the same results.
REASONABLE doubt means just that. There is none in this case. Let's see, this adult man is accused by many young male children, he admits they sleep in his bedroom, and on and on and on. He is guilty as sin, and I mean that literally. If he were some Joe Schmoe, he'd already be in prison.
I gave up on the 'Ghost of Christmases Past' when he forked over $25 million to shut that boy up.
Look, the 'Thrilla' admits to sleeping with these kids. What 45 year old men do you wish to allow to sleep with your little boys or girls?
Parents who continue to expose their children to this clown are unfit.
You do understand that "innocent until proven guilty" applies to jurors, NOT public opinion, yours or mine. That is nothing more than a cop-out, intended to make you unable to form your own opinions, or judgements. You know, you DO have the right and responsibility to make judgements every day, in all situations. Please do not give me that "innocent until proven guilty" clap-trap again.
The point is this: No responsible parent would allow their child to be around a man suspected of sexual abuse of children. I wouldn't let my children within 100 feet of this sick bastard. I don't gamble with my children's well being or safety. Those that do in order to allow their children to spend time with a celebrity should have their kids removed. Period!!!!!!!!!
I say, keep him away from kids until he's either dead or proven not guilty!
Can we agree that it's not a good idea to let your children go to a party at the home of a guy that's NUTS!