Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sore/Loserman strikes again.
1 posted on 12/09/2004 10:46:02 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Daveinyork
So it is illegal now in the United States to display a picture of the President of the United States on public property?
2 posted on 12/09/2004 10:49:09 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

unbelievable ....


3 posted on 12/09/2004 10:49:45 AM PST by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
Fax him a portrait of Bush. This one prints out nicely on one page. Fax number is for the city office.

Here is a direct link to the phone if you can print from your browser

Bush Portrait Here

8 posted on 12/09/2004 10:58:00 AM PST by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
Oops! Correction:

Here is a direct link to the photo if you want to print from your browser.

I wrote
Here is a direct link to the phone if you can print from your browser

10 posted on 12/09/2004 11:00:15 AM PST by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

BTTT


11 posted on 12/09/2004 11:03:05 AM PST by brightx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
The market is public property and displaying political paraphernalia, no matter what the intent, says Polite, is inappropriate and divisive.

All well and good, Mr. Mayor........but since when is a photograph of the sitting President of the United States "political paraphernalia"??????

I'm sure there are plenty of portraits of Presidents in numerous public properties. What no picture of the President in City Hall? shame.

12 posted on 12/09/2004 11:03:48 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
"The standholder has refused to do so, prompting Polite to say he will ask City Council to change the law so all political items would be banned in public places."

Polite is effectively advocating the banning of campaign ads during an election campaign.

Blatantly unconstitutional. Any elected official who advocates overturning the constitution should be impeached or recalled, possibly jailed.
13 posted on 12/09/2004 11:05:31 AM PST by Dat Mon (clever tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

Speechless.......


15 posted on 12/09/2004 11:16:27 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
Already posted

Link Here

16 posted on 12/09/2004 11:18:37 AM PST by tx_eggman ("All I need to know about Islam I learned on 09/11/01" - Crawdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

"The market is public property and displaying political paraphernalia, no matter what the intent, says Polite, is inappropriate and divisive."

Oh for the love of Pete! Political paraphernalia?? I guess we should start yanking pictures of former Presidents displayed within "public property"...


18 posted on 12/09/2004 11:21:55 AM PST by raivyn (I love the smell of FUMING LIBERALS in the morning, but I hate the noise. (Don't you?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

I swear. The more I read about stuff like this, the more it seems like the dims are portraying the Soviet Unions sensorship policies.

Does anyone in their party realize the hypocracy and danger of their sensorship policies.


19 posted on 12/09/2004 11:23:27 AM PST by CriticalJ (Ecc 10:2 A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
" ...prompting Polite to say he will ask City Council to change the law so all political items would be banned in public places. ... Polite says he had received complaints from constituents who thought the photos were inappropriate, especially after the presidential election. The market is public property and displaying political paraphernalia, no matter what the intent, says Polite, is inappropriate and divisive. "There should be rules," Polite says. "

I) Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or the press...

This is located in "The Bill of Rights" in the First Amendment to "The Constitution", Mr. Polite. It is why you, as a government legislator, are NOT ALLOWED to stop citizens from expressing their ideas and opinions whether by spoken word or on paper.

If, Councilman Polite, you insist on carrying out your threat to make this illegal, don't be surprised if you are not able to finish out your elected term. Freedom of speech is not something most Americans are happy to have taken away from them by some overzealous lawmaker.
21 posted on 12/09/2004 11:33:00 AM PST by spinestein (Intolerance will not be tolerated !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

'The market is public property and displaying political paraphernalia, no matter what the intent, says Polite, is inappropriate and divisive.'

So does this guy want to do away with campaign signs also, if they are on public property? They also can be considered divisive! What about when you go to the federal courthouse and you see Bush's picture posted there? You can really carry this too far. And do not even think about posting this guy's picture, that would divisive to me! This guy a is a real horse's behind!


22 posted on 12/09/2004 11:41:30 AM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

Does this guy "Polite" now what he sounds and looks like?
No wonder these clowns lost. I think this guy must have the IQ of a carrot.


23 posted on 12/09/2004 11:42:27 AM PST by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork
The standholder has refused to do so, prompting Polite to say he will ask City Council to change the law so all political items would be banned in public places.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but specifically in public places, doesn't the First Amendment address precisely this sort of public expression?

What kind of a public moron would not know that?

25 posted on 12/09/2004 11:44:17 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daveinyork

Does this guy "Polite" know what he sounds and looks like?
No wonder these clowns lost. I think this guy must have the IQ of a carrot.

Correction: know not now. sorry


27 posted on 12/09/2004 11:52:01 AM PST by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson