Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather blinks [Cal Thomas nails it!]
Townhall.com ^ | November 25, 2004 | Cal Thomas

Posted on 11/26/2004 1:46:41 AM PST by Quilla

Dan Rather, who has announced his "retirement" next March from the anchor desk he has held for 24 years, is a dinosaur. After the last of the old news anchors leaves his chair (Peter Jennings will be the final one sitting), Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jennings will be fossils. There will not be their like again.

Rather earned his stripes and paid his dues during a career that has spanned four decades at CBS and as a wire-service reporter before that. He is a man who loves his country. Recall his emotional breakdown on the "Late Show With David Letterman" following 9/11. Rather said he would go and fight the terrorists if the president asked him. Some thought his performance strange, even grandstanding. I thought he meant it.

While Rather is 73 and could have been expected to retire soon (his predecessor, Walter Cronkite, was forced out at age 65), the controversy over faked National Guard documents purporting to show George W. Bush failed to fulfill his military obligations appeared to give CBS management the excuse it needed to make a change. Rather, who helped bring down Richard Nixon, was himself brought down by a gross inaccuracy and a type of stonewalling reminiscent of the president he tormented.

It doesn't matter who replaces Rather. Everyone at that level of broadcast journalism has been ideologically vetted. No one who is a conservative is allowed to ascend to the top of major news organizations. If you disagree, try naming one. Despite plummeting ratings and numerous surveys that have shown large numbers of people believe the major networks approach the things conservatives care about with a bias, even hostility, network executives refuse to acknowledge those feelings and continue to present the news through the filter of their leftist ideological worldview.

Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center and a frequent critic of Rather, observed: "Mr. Rather's bias is part of an institutional problem throughout the national 'news' media - identified by former longtime CBS News correspondent Bernard Goldberg - which is the arrogant notion that their point of view is always accurate and always relevant to any story in which they choose to inject it."

More proof that nothing changes at the networks is the appointment of Jonathan Klein as president of CNN. Klein was executive vice president of CBS News. He praised the "60 Minutes" producer, Mary Mapes, who received and vouched for the forged National Guard documents from a well-known Bush-hater. Klein called Mapes "absolutely peerless . . . in the profession. She is a crack journalist."

Klein also blasted Internet bloggers for exposing the forged documents and CBS's error in standing behind them. He stereotyped a blogger as "a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing what he thinks." The bloggers did a better job than CBS news anchors and producers, who sit around in their expensive suits telling us what they think. Klein carries his biases from CBS to CNN.

The "60 Minutes" curmudgeon, Andy Rooney, has been making a bigger fool of himself lately by calling conservative Christians uneducated and ignorant. When the sports commentator Jimmy "the Greek" Snyder disparaged blacks in 1988, Dan Rather aired video of the remarks, which led to Snyder's firing by CBS management. That Rooney still holds his job after stereotyping and disparaging Christians sends a message of bias, even bigotry, to a substantial audience that CBS has mostly lost and obviously does not care if it wins back.

CBS's eye logo is an appropriate metaphor for what ails the network. "There is none so blind as they that won't see," wrote Jonathan Swift. Notice he didn't say "can't see," but "won't see."

CBS is not blind, but it deliberately closes its eyes to the institutional bias that substantial numbers of Americans can see quite clearly. Unlike the period during which anchors dominated the national news stage, people now have choices. They are choosing cable, especially Fox News Channel, in growing numbers.

If CBS continues in denial - and it will - its evening news ratings, which have been in third place for several years, will suffer further decline. It didn't have to be this way for Dan Rather or for the once great CBS. He should have learned from Richard Nixon that cover-up and stonewalling can come back to haunt you


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calthomas; cbs; cbsnews; mediabias; pc; politicalcorrectness; rather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
I'm still not clear why after the Westinghouse/CBS merger, the network was renamed WeBS.

Great article, Mr. Thomas

1 posted on 11/26/2004 1:46:42 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"Klein called Mapes "absolutely peerless . . . in the profession. She is a crack journalist."

So tempting, so tempting.

2 posted on 11/26/2004 1:52:14 AM PST by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

A subtle pun at Rather's own autobiography "The Camera Never Blinks"?


3 posted on 11/26/2004 1:52:59 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Let's REALLY Split The Country! (http://righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

bump


4 posted on 11/26/2004 1:53:21 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; dansangel

Good read, but another piece that won't float to the top where the masses will see it..


5 posted on 11/26/2004 2:23:38 AM PST by .45MAN ("God bless America and George W. Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Old Cal is playing nice-nice along with fellow members of Big Media. Even Brent Bozell was letting Rather ride off into the sunset without knocking him off his high horse? Have we forgotten what Rather & Mapes were trying to do? The timing of it?
Let me remind you... They ran with an old, old story (not to be equated to the perfidious behavior of his challenger) about President Bush and tried to blow life into it very late in the campaign, and they did so with childishly spurious documents tendered by well-known crank and malcontent. When presented with irrefutable proof of the forgery Rather churlishly persisted in defending his shoddy work. Rather, to this day, has not apologized or even denounced the credibility of the papers. An inquiry(!) has been underway since the incident. It's looking like we'll find out who killed JFK before it winds up its business but meanwhile Rather & Mapes are collecting their checks.
If we didn't have the most generous libel laws in all the world, Rather & Mapes might be in the stocks.
Seeing these old boys file their sad adieus to the corrupt Face of CBS News makes me want to hurl chunks.

P.S. It was Rather that pushed old Uncle Walter ("The Most Trusted Man in America") out the door when he made it plain that he could do other things if he didn't get the anchor chair on his timetable.

6 posted on 11/26/2004 2:24:01 AM PST by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Klein called Mapes "absolutely peerless . . . in the profession. She is a crack journalist."

I could have sworn I saw her standing next to the Crack whore down the street.... oh never mind

7 posted on 11/26/2004 2:35:28 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; Travis McGee; B4Ranch; Grampa Dave; Squantos; white trash redneck; Eaker; AK2KX; ...
The air was electric during a public panel on political reporting convened right before the DNC convention earlier in the year. The "old media guard" spoke as a group.

It was a foreshadow of things to come...


Kennedy School of Government discussion 'The Press and the Election'

Shorenstein Center panel convenes Brokaw, Jennings, Lehrer, Rather, Woodruff

On this panel discussion about the state of the media (before Rather's recent memo Waterloo), Rather and Woodruff were evidently a bit cowed by the severe freeping they were getting; concerned Americans were apparently complaining to their studios -- especially via E-mail.

Judy was particularly concerned that this could disrupt her professional focus!

Angry comments were apparently effective in making them realize that many of the American people are actually afraid of the press and what they're doing to our nation with their selfish partisanship. As noted below, the whole transcript is there to read. I may post a thread for its URL if I get enough interest. It's a 77-page PDF file.

I'd be exaggerating if I said that the discussion empasized how the panelists felt intimidated. But I picked up on that.

MS. WOODRUFF: No, I don't see it as a media problem. And I'm going to chime in with what Jim, what he and Tom have said, I mean it's going on but what we do in our newsrooms, the decisions we make about what we are going to cover and how we are going to approach stories can't change because people are out there fighting each other. Sure, it makes it an interesting story and we want to cover that story. But in no way should we feel on the defensive for example, if we get a lot of e-mails or letters or calls or whatever, and people are saying, you're not representing that point of view, sure, we should pay attention, we want what we do, to a degree, to be interactive, we want to be responsive, in a way. But it can never govern what we do. And I would just add here, I think a lot of this divisiveness that we are talking about here this morning has been churned up by our political leadership, I mean there is a lot that they are doing, both political parties, to churn this up. --Transcript

8 posted on 11/26/2004 2:37:36 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

"You're right Cal. We at CBS hate those bible thumping Christians as much as an alligator crossing an asphalt highway in a room full of rocking chairs. This controversy is hotter than a blue tailed swallow in a July barnyard. Merry Chr.....errrr, Happy Holidays.

Courage!"

9 posted on 11/26/2004 2:40:18 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: risk

Scary pic... Why do they all have the same shaped heads?


10 posted on 11/26/2004 2:40:26 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
So tempting, so tempting. Yes I had to laugh when I got to that bit also!
11 posted on 11/26/2004 2:42:45 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

bump


12 posted on 11/26/2004 2:53:28 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
He is a man who loves his country.

A man who truly loves his country does not try to take down a sitting president with a smear campaign knowingly based on forged documents. Rather's hatred of Republicans will be his legacy...his dress stain if you will.

13 posted on 11/26/2004 3:03:54 AM PST by peyton randolph (Time for Bush to pack the U.S. Supremes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I just realized of whom the aging Dan reminds me in his photos- He looks like his old nemesis J. Edgar Hoover, with hair. Must be a personality thing...


14 posted on 11/26/2004 3:04:20 AM PST by pkok (GW - There's "there" there, thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; Fedora

ping to my link to the Shorenstein Center panel on media and politics from earlier in the year (right before the DNC convention). Some fortuitous stuff from Brokaw, Jennings, Lehrer, Rather, and Woodruff.


15 posted on 11/26/2004 3:04:50 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The MSM needs to learn the old/early digital programing bit,,,Garbage-In-Garbge-Out.


16 posted on 11/26/2004 3:08:06 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
Well said. The issue is bias but it goes beyond that: the Old Media are used to having power. They were the ones that relentlessly pushed their issues as "news" night after night and when even presidents stood in their way went after them. Anyone who lived through their coverage of the Vietnam War saw the effects of the Dan Rathers and their anti-US bias in every telecast. Even Watergate itself was less a crime than the synergy between the opposition/pro-enemy Left and the broadcast and print media to knock Nixon down.

The Old Media never stood for the unfiltered dissemination of information for the interpretation of the people - they stood for the art and power of filtering it for us for their own political ends. They were and are unelected political operatives that until the cable and the Internet came along enjoyed enormous influence.

Dan Rather's latest blunt instrument attack on George Bush, timed to influence the election, is only the latest from 40 years of these types of tactics. The difference is that this time, we have other means to get information and he and his cohorts stood exposed in the open.

17 posted on 11/26/2004 3:08:50 AM PST by USMCVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pkok

18 posted on 11/26/2004 3:22:36 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: risk

>>I think a lot of this divisiveness that we are talking about here this morning has been churned up by our political leadership, I mean there is a lot that they are doing, both political parties, to churn this up. --<<

What? MS. WOODRUFF is concerned with this divisiveness caused by political diversity?


19 posted on 11/26/2004 3:33:30 AM PST by B4Ranch ((The lack of alcohol in my coffee forces me to see reality!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

Well said indeed. Now that RatherBiased Dan is being allowed to ride off into the sunset like a Texas Toad hopping merrily across old U.S. 90 on a hot July afternoon in search of an old '57 Chevy hubcap filled with rainwater, everyone seems to want to let Danno off the hook.

NO FRIGGIN WAY!

As you (TGB) pointed out, what Rather, Mapes, Heyward and the rest of that motley crew were trying to do was to turn a presidential election around in favor of THEIR annointed candidate, John F'in Kerry!

Does anyone with half a brain think that Rather would be announcing his upcoming retirement if the Democratic Party, in a mass orgasm, were preparing for the (gag, choke, spew) Inauguration of President-elect John Forbes Kerry?

No, I didn't think so either.

If Rather is still breathing oxygen on January 21, 2009, I would love to think that FORMER President George W. Bush will direct his attorneys to sue the living dogs--t out of Dan Rather and CBS News for what they did to him personally, and for what CBS did to all of America.

They don't call 'em SEE-BS for nothing.


20 posted on 11/26/2004 3:35:54 AM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson