"How can it be that we have sunk so far in the Netherlands? I am really worried about this," she told Dutch television.
Ever try looking at yourself?
No worse than what the NY Times will publish about our own President.
Mike
No it is a microcasim of what is happening right here.
the leftist dutch are getting what they have comming to them for letting all the arabtrash in...
Muslim is a religion of peace. A piece of an arm, a piece of a leg or maybe even a whole head,
Coming soon to a city or town near us all, here.
"Shocked"?
Hardly.
That's like saying I am shocked that the Pope is Catholic.
Good. Now I hope shes shocked enough to do more in her professional capacity to keep these people out of Holland.
Imam Ahmad Salam told a news conference on Tuesday he was keen to talk to the minister about integration but said Islam prohibited contact with women outside the immediate family.
Exceptions apply... like if you're killing them for Allah.
By the way, has anyone heard from knighthawk lately? Could he be under cover?
The policies of appeasement will eventually fail if we fail in the global war on terror. Once this happens their (Europes) problems with radical fundamentalist Moslems will be much greater since they let the situation spiral out of control and allowed these people a foot hold in their country, gain momentum in their movements and build infrastructure/connections.
Ironically those nations with some of the largest potential for problems are those who oppose the war in Iraq and generally dont want to rock the boat to hard. France with nearly approaching 10% (over 5 million) and Germany with (3.4 million) Moslems in their countries only have to gain from us fighting the global war on terrorism. They themselves stay in the background and even render assistance on occasion. Yet never step out in front and offer their nose to get struck.
Its sad, but the USA is the biggest target since its the biggest enemy of these groups (From the Taliban to the Abu Saif group in the Philippines). While these ankle biters do little except complain and avoid any of the cost in political, economic or military aspects, it will be they who in the long run will benefit the most from this campaign.
From the perspective of the Western European, the policies of appeasement will pay great dividends if the US succeeds. If the US while depleting its resources in money people and military hardware win this war, the French and Germans will have gained enormously while having done very little. Not a bad deal, if we win. If our policies shift or we loose, the French and Germans are left with a situation where they have huge Moslem population centers in their countries. Will be hated by the fundamentalist for no other reason than they are infidels; non believers who in the fundamentalist mind is literally worth being a slave. They are logistically easier to get to in both time and distance. Easier to infiltrate with long unguarded boarders and with large and in part disgruntled Moslem populations within their own boarders they are a ticking time bomb.
If we shall fail, we will still be quite well off. However, in the long run, they will end up with major issues. Madrid, Van Gogh, Munich and several others are quickly pressed aside in the European collective thought. Politically no one wants to touch the issue. It would substantiate our claim which the Germans, French and Belgians deny. But eventually they will be forced to deal with the issue, and although to ignorant to accept it, our failure in the global war on terror will have huge implications for them.
Red6
Keep worrying. Perhaps worry will prompt critical thought and, ultimately, understanding.
Aha, here we have finally found the rare, the previously unseen, the predicted but not observed, the... long awaited... MODERATE MUSLIM.
It is all clear. The moderate ones are those that don't actually do the murder, nor support the murder, they just hope real hard for the target to die. Let's see, we've identified one "moderate muslim" - is there a second?