Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: w6ai5q37b

But they'd only be able to redefine it in states where they actually have a majority. Conservatives would be able to define it in the rest of the country.


5 posted on 11/21/2004 12:21:19 AM PST by AM2000 (I am not responsible for the contents of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: AM2000

It seems clear that the difficulty of ratifying Amendments has contributed to the rise of judicial activism, a very negative result.


6 posted on 11/21/2004 12:43:18 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AM2000
But they'd only be able to redefine it in states where they actually have a majority

That's precisely how the system is supposed to work now. The problem is the judges, not the Constitution. The judges need to be yanked, the constitution needs no change.
30 posted on 11/21/2004 6:48:55 PM PST by w6ai5q37b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson