[tame]

Uh-oh, it looks like someone hasn't actually read the key plaintiff's argument from Roe v. Wade. Under common law, this event is a prerequisite to being a "person." Please state your answer in the form of a question.

Uh-oh, someone has not thought this through very logically, or he would know his response in no way refutes my statement.

[Poohbah]

Uh-oh, someone has not thought this through very logically, or he would know his response in no way refutes my statement.

Under common law, this event is a prerequisite to being a "person." Please state your answer in the form of a question.

Please note: this is the second time I've asked.

It's a fundamental defect in common law has to be addressed in statutory law.