I am at post 1, and without reading further, I can predict the direction that this thread will take. The pro-evolution posters will be all over this article like a dog on a bone. The anti-evolution side must do something that I have yet to see them do, and that is to somehow persuade someone with first-hand knowledge such as the author of this article, or a Michael Behe, or someone else of that caliber to participate in the discussion. Although it saddens may to say so, the pro-evolution posters are usually more knowledgeable about arguments to support their position than are those on the anti-evolution side. However, although my technical/scientific knowledge is not in the biologic sciences, I find the ID arguments as put forth by the leading proponents very compelling.
Perhaps you ought to read on.......you'll find that the pro-evo. posters have walked away fom any discussion concerning their fairytale 'creation story' even though I placed their names in the header.
But then if I had an improbably silly-sounding creation story like that as the foundation of my belief system, I'd also walk away from any discussion.