Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666

Of course, Dawkins Also posits that worms should have rights too.


289 posted on 11/12/2004 12:47:54 PM PST by Lindykim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]


To: Lindykim
Of course, Dawkins Also posits that worms should have rights too.

Then you should be glad.

290 posted on 11/12/2004 12:51:00 PM PST by balrog666 (The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

To: Lindykim
Of course, Dawkins Also posits that worms should have rights too.

Dawkins is limited by his own incredible blind loyalty to materialism. His statement about religion was not only inaccurate, it was a deliberate lie. Dawkins most certainly knew the founders of modern science were mostly Christian. Actually, it is the materialists who gladly renounce reason when necessary and happily embrace a chauvinistic devotion to a rusty mis-firing oil-burning philosophy that has no explanitory power.

291 posted on 11/12/2004 1:00:10 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson