The problem you have is that none of the evidence is following the patterns that it should have if Darwinism were true. The fossil record does not show gradual change over time, as the article above points out, and everyone acknowledges this except for some of the less-informed evos--if the fossil record didn't have to be explained away, your side would never have come up with punctuated equilibrium.
126 posted on 11/11/2004 11:36:53 AM PST by VadeRetro
(A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
Look, Vade, despite your attempts to have fun by showing only the skulls of selected animals, the fossil record is a problem for you. Do you think your own evolutionary scientists came up with the "hopeful monster" of punk-eek because they were bored?
Here's an article on the subject that I found on the fly. Enjoy, have a great day, and now I really am going to get back to work, as much as I love kicking around stuff like this on FR.
131 posted on 11/11/2004 11:50:36 AM PST by Buggman
(Your failure to be informed does not make me a kook.)