[Protagoras]

From the pharmacist's POV, the script was to be used to commit an immoral act.

That allows any liberal to take your gun.

You are employing pretzel logic.

If you really think that people can steal other peoples property because of the POV of the thief, you need to rethink.

[robertpaulsen]

"That allows any liberal to take your gun."

Not take. Retain.

That assumes, 1) you're stupid enough to give a liberal your gun to begin with and, 2) you tell them that your going to use that gun to commit a immoral act (murder, armed robbery, assault (threat), whatever).

He would certainly have a moral obligation to retain the weapon (whether he's a liberal or a conservative), if not a legal obligation.

All I'm saying is that if you can understand why the pharmacist could not fill the prescription, then certainly you can understand why he could not return it.

Actually, if you think about it, it would be quite hypocritical of him to refuse to fill it then return it to be filled by someone else.

[Doctor Stochastic]

It also allows any liberal to take your ballot.

It also allows any Moslem (or Jew) to take your bacon.