[Phantom Lord]

I disagree that pharmacists should be forced to choose between keeping their jobs and abiding by their morals.

I disagree with you on this. And not just regarding pharmacists. When one takes a job they are responsible for completing all the duties attached to that job unless an agreement was made with the employer that certain aspects would not be done.

Should a devout catholic who is also a chef at a steak house refuse to cook and serve meat on Fridays and expect to keep his job without prior agreement from the employer?

[He Rides A White Horse]

I disagree with you on this. And not just regarding pharmacists. When one takes a job they are responsible for completing all the duties attached to that job unless an agreement was made with the employer that certain aspects would not be done.

See post #267.

[70times7]

Should a devout catholic who is also a chef at a steak house refuse to cook and serve meat on Fridays and expect to keep his job without prior agreement from the employer?

I think that depends on whether the steak was cut from a cow or a person. Don't you?

I was pointing out that this is a life and death issue. I don't pretent to know what to do about the potential ramifications from the abuse of the involved principle, but I am smart enough to recognise when it is happening, thank you.