Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Election Monitoring Circus Leaves Town
Canadian Press ^ | November 8, 2004 | Peyton Knight

Posted on 11/08/2004 8:26:30 AM PST by MikeEdwards

The 2004 presidential election has come and gone with nary a hitch. The problems that mired the 2000 election, some of them real but most of them fabricated, were practically nonexistent this go-around. Of course, there were a few blips and minor kinks that surfaced, but we can rest assured that these too will be corrected.

Why? Because our electoral system is a certified thing of beauty. It places accountability at the local level, thereby empowering citizens to effectively police themselves and solve any unique problems that only they can diagnose. Score another one for our Founding Fathers. The only dissenters, it seems, are those from the unprecedented team of international monitors that invaded this year’s electoral proceedings. . . . .

To read the entire Canada Free Press column, click on The Election Monitoring Circus Leaves Town

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democracy; election; monitor; presidential

1 posted on 11/08/2004 8:26:31 AM PST by MikeEdwards
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
I'm not sure what the problem is.

I spent the day monitoring the polls.

I was certified by the local Republican Party Chairman.

If these election officials wanted to do the same, they could have done the same. They could have been certified by either any of the Party organizations, either at the local, Congressional District, or State levels, or by the campaign organizations of any candidate on the ballot at the particular precincts they wanted to observe, or by the Secretary of States' office, etc..

State law grants unrestricted access to certified poll challengers, and there are dozens of organizations that are authorized to certify challengers.

But, oddly enough, the US Department of State isn't among them.

2 posted on 11/08/2004 8:43:02 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
Aguayo’s specific criticisms of the U.S. system are a "complete lack" of spending limits, the need to secure voting rights for felons, and (here’s the big enchilada) the nationalization and socialization of our elections through federal oversight and public financing. So much for taking Sergio seriously.

Got to hand it to this lot: it takes big kahunas to criticize the OLDEST EXISTING REPUBLIC on how to set up elections!
I wonder if they are aware of how ignorant it makes them look...
3 posted on 11/08/2004 8:43:02 AM PST by Edgerunner (The left ain't right. Hand me that launch pickle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

Without a hitch? I need to read no further. This write knows nothing.


4 posted on 11/08/2004 8:43:38 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

"...and the horse they rode in on"


5 posted on 11/08/2004 8:44:05 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
What is the name of the swamp witch that petitioned to bring them here? That would be a project to get rid of her. I know she is from Texas......and has a different name?
6 posted on 11/08/2004 8:45:33 AM PST by marmar (Faith is a beautiful thing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson