Posted on 11/05/2004 4:00:52 PM PST by 4.1O dana super trac pak
Bush's threat to ban Tancredo from the White House didn't work on Tancredo, but some of these new guys may be made of lesser stuff.
Throw open the floodgates and learn how to speak Spanish I guess...
I have no problems with the Child Labor Laws. Even leaving out the moral issues involved, children would not be efficient workers for the kind of economy the US has. As to toxic dumping -- well, I think we've learned that it costs way more money to clean up what gets dumped than to prevent the dumping in the first place. Basically, I think adults should just take care of themselves and stop asking the government to.
I am glad I voted for the Constitution Party candidate. I know I did not have a lot of company on this board in 04, but maybe next time I will.
Three already sent, and I'm getting more signed.
I did the same thing, and my conscience is clear.
Free flow??? Good God. It's a flippin flood. Workers needs. Jeeze Louise... all they have to do is sneak across and pop a baby out and they are in--- welching off taxpayers. What am I talking about, they are welching anyway you look at it.
TAKE TIME. Mercy. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out TIME is something we don't have. errrrrr, it isn't just the Mexicans slipping across.
I hope those "war room" readers are still lurking.
I agree. The exportation of immigrants to the US is such an established part of their policy now that there's no going back. It's also part of their economic growth plan, and one Mexican columnist, Ana Maria Salazar, has now said that the number one threat to Mexican national security is that the U.S. would close the border.
there's still a fair amount of public opinion in Mexico that it is too dangerous to cross the border and that feeling deters people. There is also an unfounded fear that they will be caught and sent home by Homeland Security. Fox needs to whittle away at these sentiments, because they are impeding his exportation program. An anmesty or official declaration from US officials would take away the inhibitions of the Mexican poor who remain and encourage them to head north. Even with a guest worker program, we're going to see even larger numbers of illegals when that declaration is made.
Yes --immigration to the USA has become the only plan other than NAFTA maquilas being brought in. All the elites care about is getting the wealth they can from that country, they have no interest in building up a stable economy or improving the society. They're also beginning to move to the USA side en masse --- it seems almost no one has any real patriotism in that country.
And WHY was it imperative to re-elect Bush?
I think the only way to stop the total government takeover of our health care would be to require employers to provide insurance benefits. Most American businesses employing Americans already offer health insurance benefits --- it's been almost standard in this country for several generations. The businesses which profit by hiring cheap foreign labor are the ones that get by without offering health insurance, they also don't pay into Workman's Comp and don't pay their workers enough for the workers to obtain their own insurance --- basically they've learned they can bring in very cheap labor and profit immensely by having the taxpayers subsidize their labor costs.
It was interesting how the hispanic chamber of commerces --- which have been demanding access to government provided health care for their workers were the first to scream at the idea of employers providing health insurance benefits.
I don't see how he could since he and Kerry were pretty much equal on amnesty --- Bush was elected because Kerry is far more liberal. Giving up control to the UN and world government is worse and would be harder to break away from later. The Mexican government might be calling the shots for now but really has no strength and can be brought into control later down the road.
"I think the only way to stop the total government takeover of our health care would be to require employers to provide insurance benefits."
Requiring US employers to do that (and I assume you mean by federal law) only makes it that much more expensive to employ US labor and then jobs go overseas. And we know the business lobbyists will be working overtime so such legislation never gets near a vote anyway.
I don't know. It is a tough one.
And congress will be hearing about this.
I have never been a big congress nagger, but THIS issue affects our security. Saxby Chambliss' staff is going to get to know me by my first name. : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.