Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Supreme Court Nominees?

Posted on 11/03/2004 6:43:18 AM PST by Bluegrass Federalist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: TRY ONE
When the new Senate comes into session, it must vote to reaffirm or change the rules by which it will function. It is not bound by the operational rules of the prior Senate. The Rules Committee chairman can propose a new rule to limit the application of a filibuster to judicial nominations (or to change the requirements for invoking cloture). Such a proposed rule change cannot be filibustered. The Vice President, exercising his constitutional power as Senate president can rule any attempt to filibuster such a vote on a rule out of order. To pass such a rule would simply require a majority vote. And, if the vote were tied, the Vice President, again exercising his constitutional power could cast the deciding vote. However, the real problem is getting enough Republican senators to vote for the rule change.
41 posted on 11/03/2004 7:05:16 AM PST by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

"Can we bring back Bork?"

I think I read that he is ailing, but getting him on the SC would be a beautiful thing. Poetic even.


42 posted on 11/03/2004 7:06:22 AM PST by myheroesareDeadandRegistered (You can't trust a Poodle to operate a grenade laucher or a Nuclear Football!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
Bork is too liberal.

I want Bush to appoint someone who will make Scalia look liberal.

I want a conservative who will never "grow in office" an wind up as a lib or moderate.

43 posted on 11/03/2004 7:07:00 AM PST by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Montfort

And he or she should be young enough to be on the court for 35 years easily.


44 posted on 11/03/2004 7:08:03 AM PST by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cowman

Ooooh, good one. Roy Moore would give them fits.


45 posted on 11/03/2004 7:08:48 AM PST by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: zebrahead

Ethnically I believe you're right. It is almost certain the prez will nominate a hispanic to SCOTUS.


46 posted on 11/03/2004 7:10:52 AM PST by hardhead (Liberty Watch - http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/liberty-watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1268525/posts>

GOP Sweeps Into Supreme Court (100% GOP - Alabama)

47 posted on 11/03/2004 7:11:33 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky
I am proud to nominate: Mark Levin for Justice of The Supreme Court.
48 posted on 11/03/2004 7:11:50 AM PST by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
I say, Chief Justice Clarence Thomas!

I'm with you. And dare the enemy to oppose it.

49 posted on 11/03/2004 7:13:47 AM PST by Guard Dog (SWEET VICTORY!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky

The truly weird thing is that the GOP Majority may put the liberal Arlen Specter in charge of the Judiciary and the Democrat Minority Leader may be the nominally pro-life Democrat Reid.


50 posted on 11/03/2004 7:14:53 AM PST by azcap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Anybody but Bork.


51 posted on 11/03/2004 7:15:39 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky

Control of the executive branch, control of the legislative branch, and control of the judicial branch: SWEEP!! America has a chance, now expect sabotage.


52 posted on 11/03/2004 7:16:30 AM PST by Flightdeck (Gravity and EM are the same thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Good idea! I would re-nominate Bork just to wear these Bastards out in hearings before re-nominating or nominating new candidates.

Bork would have to go along with this plan.


53 posted on 11/03/2004 7:17:59 AM PST by Fithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
Clear majority in every branch.

No more excuses. This could be make or break time for conservatives. Or should we give up on the GOP ever being conservative ever again?

54 posted on 11/03/2004 7:18:27 AM PST by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky

"Does the Daschle loss break the filibuster?"


That plus GOP gains in the Sen and House and Bush's majority pop vote. The Dems will scream and screech but in the end they will have to let the judges to go a vote.


55 posted on 11/03/2004 7:21:01 AM PST by The Hound Passer (Sitting home in protest this Nov is a vote for Kerry and Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Judge Paul Cassell
56 posted on 11/03/2004 7:27:29 AM PST by SC DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pharlap
Well stated!

As you said: ".... the real problem is getting enough Republican senators to vote for the rule change."

There are ~ 4-5 Pubbie Sinators who just luv to be "fair".

--- McLain, Spector, Chaffee, and the 2 chicks from Maine
57 posted on 11/03/2004 7:29:36 AM PST by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

I think Specter will be line this time around. He got a huge primary scare and survived it only because Bush went to bat for him. AT least I hope it is so.


58 posted on 11/03/2004 7:33:36 AM PST by Bluegrass Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

You have mentioned the very same ones I have in mind.


59 posted on 11/03/2004 7:35:28 AM PST by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: FutureSenatorFromKentucky

Estrada and all the others who's good character was slandered because they are pro-life and believe in God (not just say they believe in God for political gain)


60 posted on 11/03/2004 7:37:57 AM PST by Linda Sandoval (God's already worked one miracle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson