Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration

The difference is that an Coverdell and Miller were statesmen, and Isakson will never be.

I voted for Isakson because he is better than Majette, but that is the only reason. He is better than Majette because she is a nut case, almost as bad as McKinny. On the other hand, she would be easier to defeat in the next election, but she could do a lot of damage in 6 years.

Maybe Bush will appoint Isakson to some useless post during the next 4 years and we can replace him with a Republican.


14 posted on 11/01/2004 5:11:14 AM PST by jpw01 (Freep the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: jpw01
This guy must be really be a pretty bad Republican.

However, remember, we are dealing with retaining the Majority of the Senate, which in turn, effects chairmenships of committees.

We do not want Ted Kennedy, Hillary and Kerry heading any committees.

15 posted on 11/01/2004 5:16:00 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson