Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael81Dus
Unfortunately the science of aeriel bombing in 1945 was extreemly crude by todays standards. On any number of occassions the Allied and Axis air forces completely missed their targets. Part of the plan was to destroy the marshalling yards and the rolling stock which I assume must have been close to the inner city.

As to the USAF in Bagdad you might want to read the report the Lancet put out today ( most of which is rubbish), collateral damage happens even with todays advanced technology.

From a military standpoint the bombing of civilian targets is counter productive as the Germans found out when they swithched bombing RAF bases in southern England to bomb London in 1940. Had they persevered the outcome of the Battle of Britain might have been quite different.

75 posted on 10/29/2004 8:58:52 AM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Timocrat

"It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, should be reviewed. Otherwise we shall come into control of an utterly ruined land. We shall not, for instance, be able to get housing material out of Germany for our own needs because some temporary provision would have to be made for the Germans themselves. I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives, such as oil and communications behind the immediate battle-zone, rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction. "

Winston Churchill to Arthur Harris on March 28th 1945


76 posted on 10/29/2004 9:13:56 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson